• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一眼识数:神奇数字还是纯粹的迷信?

Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition?

作者信息

Balakrishnan J D, Ashby F G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 1992;54(2):80-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00937136.

DOI:10.1007/BF00937136
PMID:1620801
Abstract

It is widely believed that humans are endowed with a specialized numerical process, called subitizing, which enables them to apprehend rapidly and accurately the numerosity of small sets of objects. A major part of the evidence for this process is a purported discontinuity in the mean response time (RT) versus numerosity curves at about 4 elements, when subjects enumerate up to 7 or more elements in a visual display. In this article, RT data collected in a speeded enumeration experiment are subjected to a variety of statistical analyses, including several tests on the RT distributions. None of these tests reveals a significant discontinuity as numerosity increases. The data do suggest a strong stochastic dominance in RT by display numerosity, indicating that the mental effort required to enumerate does increase with each additional element in the display, both within and beyond the putative subitizing range.

摘要

人们普遍认为,人类具有一种特殊的数字处理能力,称为快速识数,它使人类能够快速准确地理解少量物体的数量。这一过程的主要证据之一是,当受试者在视觉显示中枚举多达7个或更多元素时,平均反应时间(RT)与数量曲线在大约4个元素处据称存在不连续性。在本文中,对快速枚举实验中收集的RT数据进行了各种统计分析,包括对RT分布的几项测试。随着数量的增加,这些测试均未显示出显著的不连续性。数据确实表明,显示数量在RT中具有很强的随机优势,这表明枚举所需的心理努力确实会随着显示中每增加一个元素而增加,无论是在假定的快速识数范围内还是之外。

相似文献

1
Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition?一眼识数:神奇数字还是纯粹的迷信?
Psychol Res. 1992;54(2):80-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00937136.
2
Is subitizing a unique numerical ability?
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):555-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03207540.
3
More than superstition: differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting.不止是迷信:特征异质性和变化对即时计数与逐一计数的不同影响
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):743-60. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.5.743.
4
Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.通过指向位置进行枚举:一种测量视觉对象表征数量的新方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):303-8. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0030-5.
5
Believing what we do not believe: Acquiescence to superstitious beliefs and other powerful intuitions.相信我们并不相信的事物:对迷信观念及其他强大直觉的默认。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Mar;123(2):182-207. doi: 10.1037/rev0000017. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Mental Numerosity Line in the Human's Approximate Number System.人类近似数字系统中的心理数字线
Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;63(3):169-79. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000324.
7
Emotional salience, emotional awareness, peculiar beliefs, and magical thinking.情感显著性、情感意识、奇特信念和神奇思维。
Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):197-205. doi: 10.1037/a0015395.
8
Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources.数感而非数量估计需要注意力资源。
J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):20. doi: 10.1167/10.6.20.
9
Subitizing and similarity: toward a pattern-matching theory of enumeration.即时计数与相似性:迈向一种枚举的模式匹配理论
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):676-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03196531.
10
Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?即时计数是否反映数字估计?
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):607-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02130.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of neurofeedback training for improving attentional performance in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.神经反馈训练对改善健康成年人注意力表现的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jan 5;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00053. eCollection 2024.
2
Spatial and chromatic properties of numerosity estimation in isolation and context.孤立和语境中数量估计的空间和颜色属性。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0274564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274564. eCollection 2022.
3
Feature Counting Is Impaired When Shifting Attention Between the Eyes in Adults With Amblyopia.

本文引用的文献

1
The discrimination of visual number.视觉数字辨别
Am J Psychol. 1949 Oct;62(4):498-525.
2
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.神奇的数字七,加二或减二:我们信息处理能力的某些局限。
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97.
3
Perception of numbers by human infants.人类婴儿对数字的感知。
弱视成人在两眼间转移注意力时,特征计数能力受损。
Front Neurosci. 2021 May 20;15:674146. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.674146. eCollection 2021.
4
If it looks, sounds, or feels like subitizing, is it subitizing? A modulated definition of subitizing.如果它看起来、听起来或感觉像是数感,那么它就是数感吗?数感的一种调节定义。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):790-797. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1556-0.
5
Representation of different exact numbers of prey by a spider-eating predator.以蜘蛛为食的捕食者对不同确切数量猎物的表征。
Interface Focus. 2017 Jun 6;7(3):20160035. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0035. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
6
The Numerical Competency of Two Bird Species (Corvus splendens and Acridotheres tristis).两种鸟类(家鸦和八哥)的数字能力。
Trop Life Sci Res. 2014 Aug;25(1):95-103.
7
Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures.反应时间数据的统计模拟:单过程模型、参数可变性和混合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):20-54. doi: 10.3758/BF03214411.
8
The self-organization of a spoken word.口语词汇的自组织。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 6;3:209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00209. eCollection 2012.
9
Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing.神经测量揭示了数量估计中的固定项目限制。
J Neurosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7169-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1218-12.2012.
10
The effect of viewing eccentricity on enumeration.视偏对计数的影响。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020779. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
Science. 1980 Nov 28;210(4473):1033-5. doi: 10.1126/science.7434014.
4
Span of attention, backward masking, and reaction time.
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Feb;29(2):106-12. doi: 10.3758/bf03207273.
5
A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number.
Percept Psychophys. 1982 Aug;32(2):163-70. doi: 10.3758/bf03204275.
6
Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors.
Percept Psychophys. 1982 Aug;32(2):117-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03204271.
7
Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: counting by groups.
Mem Cognit. 1982 Jul;10(4):396-404. doi: 10.3758/bf03202432.
8
Testing the assumptions of exponential, additive reaction time models.检验指数加法反应时间模型的假设。
Mem Cognit. 1982 Mar;10(2):125-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03209213.
9
Detection of intermodal numerical correspondences by human infants.人类婴儿对跨通道数字对应关系的检测。
Science. 1983 Oct 14;222(4620):179-81. doi: 10.1126/science.6623069.
10
Perceived numerosity: a comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments.
Percept Psychophys. 1984 Jun;35(6):536-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03205949.