• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖对基层医疗中药物处方的影响。

The impact of obesity on drug prescribing in primary care.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Oct;55(519):743-9.

PMID:16212848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1562331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare costs attributable to obesity have previously involved estimations based on costs of diseases commonly considered as having obesity as an underlying factor.

AIM

To quantify the impact of obesity on total primary care drug prescribing.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Review of computer generated and handwritten prescriptions to determine total prescribing volume for all drug classes.

SETTING

Twenty-three general practice surgeries in the UK.

METHOD

Stratified random selection of 1150 patients who were obese (body mass index [BMI]>30 kg/m(2)) and 1150 age and sex-matched controls of normal weight (BMI 18.5-<25 kg/m(2)). Retrospective review of medical records over an 18-month period.

RESULTS

A higher percentage of patients who were obese, compared with those of normal weight, were prescribed at least one drug in the following disease categories: cardiovascular (36% versus 20%), central nervous system (46% versus 35%), endocrine (26% versus 18%), and musculoskeletal and joint disease (30% versus 22%). All of these categories had a P-value of <0.001. Other categories, such as gastrointestinal (24% versus 18%), infections (42% versus 35%), skin (24% versus 19%) had a P-value of <0.01, while respiratory diseases (18% versus 21%) had a P-value of <0.05. Total prescribing volume was significantly higher for the group with obesity and was increased in the region of two- to fourfold in a wide range of prescribing categories: ulcer healing drugs, lipid regulators, beta-adrenoreceptor drugs, drugs affecting the rennin angiotensin system, calcium channel blockers, antibacterial drugs, sulphonylureas, biguanides, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) (P<0.001) and fibrates, angiotensin II antagonists, and thyroid drugs (P<0.05). The main impact on prescribing volumes is from numbers of patients treated, although in some areas there is an effect from greater dosage or longer treatment in those who are obese including calcium channel blockers, antihistamines, hypnotics, drugs used in the treatment of nausea and vertigo, biguanides, and NSAIDs (P<0.05) reflected in significantly increased defined daily dose prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

This large study of contemporary practice indicates that obesity more than doubled prescribing in most drug categories.

摘要

背景

以往肥胖导致的医疗费用估算基于通常认为以肥胖为潜在因素的疾病成本。

目的

量化肥胖对初级保健药物总处方量的影响。

研究设计

审查计算机生成的和手写的处方,以确定所有药物类别的总处方量。

研究地点

英国的23家全科诊所。

方法

分层随机选取1150名肥胖患者(体重指数[BMI]>30kg/m²)和1150名年龄及性别匹配的正常体重对照者(BMI 18.5 - <25kg/m²)。回顾18个月期间的病历。

结果

与正常体重者相比,肥胖患者在以下疾病类别中至少开具一种药物的比例更高:心血管疾病(36%对20%)、中枢神经系统疾病(46%对35%)、内分泌疾病(26%对18%)以及肌肉骨骼和关节疾病(30%对22%)。所有这些类别P值均<0.001。其他类别,如胃肠道疾病(24%对18%)、感染性疾病(42%对35%)、皮肤疾病(24%对19%)P值<0.01,而呼吸系统疾病(18%对21%)P值<0.05。肥胖组的总处方量显著更高,在广泛的处方类别中增加了两到四倍:溃疡愈合药物、血脂调节剂、β-肾上腺素受体药物、影响肾素血管紧张素系统的药物、钙通道阻滞剂、抗菌药物、磺脲类药物、双胍类药物、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(P<0.001)以及贝特类药物、血管紧张素II拮抗剂和甲状腺药物(P<0.05)。对处方量的主要影响来自接受治疗的患者数量,尽管在某些领域,肥胖患者的剂量更大或治疗时间更长也有影响,包括钙通道阻滞剂、抗组胺药、催眠药、用于治疗恶心和眩晕的药物、双胍类药物以及NSAIDs(P<0.05),这反映在限定日剂量处方量显著增加上。

结论

这项对当代实践的大型研究表明,肥胖使大多数药物类别的处方量增加了一倍多。

相似文献

1
The impact of obesity on drug prescribing in primary care.肥胖对基层医疗中药物处方的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Oct;55(519):743-9.
2
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
3
Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the General Practice Research Database.为何基层医疗中呼吸道疾病的抗生素处方量有所下降?一项使用全科医疗研究数据库的纵向研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Sep;26(3):268-74. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh160.
4
Influence of body mass index on prescribing costs and potential cost savings of a weight management programme in primary care.体重指数对初级保健中体重管理计划的处方成本及潜在成本节约的影响。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Jul;13(3):158-66. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007140.
5
Prescribing patterns of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic kidney disease patients in the South African private sector.南非私营部门慢性肾病患者非甾体抗炎药的处方模式。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Aug;38(4):863-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0298-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
6
The impact of specialists on prescribing by general practitioners.专科医生对全科医生开处方的影响。
Med J Aust. 2001 Oct 15;175(8):407-11. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143645.x.
7
General Practice Research Database for prescribing analysis.用于处方分析的全科医学研究数据库。
Lancet. 1998 Feb 7;351(9100):453-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78411-7.
8
What has happened to antimicrobial usage in primary care in the United Kingdom since the SMAC report? - description of trends in antimicrobial usage using the General Practice Research Database.自SMAC报告发布以来,英国初级医疗保健中的抗菌药物使用情况如何?——利用全科医疗研究数据库对抗菌药物使用趋势的描述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Dec;26(4):359-64. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh179.
9
The scale of repeat prescribing.重复开药的规模。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Nov;46(412):649-53.
10
Elderly patients in general practice: diagnoses, drugs and inappropriate prescriptions. A report from the Møre & Romsdal Prescription Study.普通医疗中的老年患者:诊断、药物及不适当处方。来自默勒-鲁姆斯达尔处方研究的报告。
Fam Pract. 1999 Aug;16(4):380-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.4.380.

引用本文的文献

1
A risk factor prediction model for moderate-to-severe postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者中重度术后疼痛的危险因素预测模型
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041398.
2
Visceral obesity augments prescription use: An analysis of the cross-sectional study of NHANES 2011-2018.内脏肥胖增加处方药物使用:对2011 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查横断面研究的分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0318413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318413. eCollection 2025.
3
Prevalence of non-communicable chronic diseases: arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and associated risk factors in long-lived elderly people.非传染性慢性病的患病率:长寿老年人中的动脉高血压、糖尿病及其相关危险因素。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Oct 9;76(4):e20220592. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0592. eCollection 2023.
4
Impact of a hospital-wide computerised approach to optimise the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions in patients with severe obesity: a quasi-experimental study.医院范围内计算机化方法对优化严重肥胖患者抗菌药物处方质量的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):972. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06682-8.
5
The effect of obesity on pain severity and pain interference.肥胖对疼痛严重程度和疼痛干扰的影响。
Pain Manag. 2021 Sep;11(5):571-581. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0089. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
6
Antiseizure Medication use in Gastric Bypass Patients and Other Post-Surgical Malabsorptive States.胃旁路手术患者及其他术后吸收不良状态下抗癫痫药物的使用
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021 Mar 22;16:100439. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100439. eCollection 2021.
7
Body mass index and risk of obesity-related conditions in a cohort of 2.9 million people: Evidence from a UK primary care database.290万人队列中的体重指数与肥胖相关疾病风险:来自英国初级保健数据库的证据
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Dec 24;7(2):137-147. doi: 10.1002/osp4.474. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Is Antimicrobial Dosing Adjustment Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Severe Obesity and Bloodstream Infections? An Exploratory Study.严重肥胖且伴有血流感染的患者,抗菌药物剂量调整与更好的治疗结果相关吗?一项探索性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 16;9(10):707. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9100707.
9
External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions.核心肥胖模型的外部验证,以评估体重管理干预措施的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Oct;38(10):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00941-3.
10
Polypharmacy, potentially serious clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, and inappropriate medicines in elderly people with type 2 diabetes and their impact on quality of life.2 型糖尿病老年患者的多种药物治疗、潜在严重的临床相关药物相互作用以及不适当的药物治疗及其对生活质量的影响。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Aug;8(4):e00621. doi: 10.1002/prp2.621.

本文引用的文献

1
A new evidence-based model for weight management in primary care: the Counterweight Programme.一种基于证据的基层医疗体重管理新模型:Counterweight项目。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2004 Jun;17(3):191-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2004.00517.x.
2
XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients.赛尼可预防肥胖受试者糖尿病(XENDOS)研究:一项关于奥利司他作为肥胖患者生活方式改变辅助手段预防2型糖尿病的随机研究。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):155-61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.155.
3
Improving management of obesity in primary care: cluster randomised trial.改善基层医疗中肥胖症的管理:整群随机试验。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 8;327(7423):1085. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1085.
4
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.通过生活方式干预或二甲双胍降低2型糖尿病的发病率。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
5
Successful weight loss maintenance.成功维持体重减轻。
Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:323-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.323.
6
Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.糖耐量受损人群通过生活方式改变预防2型糖尿病
N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1343-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801.
7
Different versions of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system and the defined daily dose--are drug utilisation data comparable?解剖学治疗学化学分类系统的不同版本与限定日剂量——药物利用数据具有可比性吗?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Dec;56(9-10):723-7. doi: 10.1007/s002280000200.
8
Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States.美国肥胖症经济成本的当前估计。
Obes Res. 1998 Mar;6(2):97-106. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1998.tb00322.x.
9
Use of lipid-lowering drugs from 1990 to 1994: an international comparison among Australia, Finland, Italy (Emilia Romagna Region), Norway and Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(3-4):185-9. doi: 10.1007/s002280050360.
10
Health care costs of obesity in New Zealand.新西兰肥胖问题的医疗保健成本。
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997 Oct;21(10):891-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800486.