Leite Francisca P, Mandeville Joseph B
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 1;29(3):901-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.022. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
Despite many desirable characteristics, event-related (ER) stimulus designs for BOLD and IRON suffer from low detection power relative to block designs because the hemodynamic impulse response function (IRF) acts as a low-pass filter on neural activation to attenuate the size of differential responses to alternate stimuli. While the use of exogenous contrast agent (IRON technique) provides an alternative fMRI method in animal models to improve sensitivity and spatial localization, the inherently slower hemodynamic IRF causes IRON detection efficiency to decrease faster than BOLD efficiency as the interstimulus interval (ISI) is shortened. Using simulations based upon assumptions of stimulus-response linearity and experimental data obtained in awake, non-human primates, this study compared detection efficiencies for fixed, random and semi-random ISI distributions for BOLD and IRON techniques. A larger relative gain in detection efficiency at short ISI was obtained by randomized designs using IRON contrast relative to BOLD contrast due to the slower IRF of the IRON method. To quantify tradeoffs between detection efficiency and the predictability of stimulus presentation, the Shannon entropy was introduced as an objective measure of predictability. Small amounts of entropy can be traded for large gains in efficiency, particularly for the IRON method.
尽管具有许多理想特性,但与事件相关(ER)的用于血氧水平依赖(BOLD)和基于内源性对比剂的磁共振成像(IRON)的刺激设计,相对于组块设计而言,检测效能较低,因为血液动力学脉冲响应函数(IRF)对神经激活起到低通滤波器的作用,从而减弱对交替刺激的差异反应的大小。虽然使用外源性对比剂(IRON技术)在动物模型中提供了另一种功能磁共振成像(fMRI)方法,以提高灵敏度和空间定位,但随着刺激间隔(ISI)缩短,固有的较慢血液动力学IRF导致IRON检测效率比BOLD效率更快下降。本研究基于刺激 - 反应线性假设进行模拟,并使用在清醒的非人灵长类动物中获得的实验数据,比较了BOLD和IRON技术在固定、随机和半随机ISI分布下的检测效率。由于IRON方法的IRF较慢,相对于BOLD对比,使用IRON对比的随机设计在短ISI时获得了更大的检测效率相对增益。为了量化检测效率与刺激呈现可预测性之间的权衡,引入香农熵作为可预测性的客观度量。少量的熵可以换来效率的大幅提升,特别是对于IRON方法。