• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性细菌性上颌窦炎:美国和欧洲对比治疗试验的结果

Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: results of U.S. and European comparative therapy trials.

作者信息

Nielsen R W

机构信息

Ear, Nose, and Throat Center of Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):70S-73S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90611-e.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(92)90611-e
PMID:1621749
Abstract

Loracarbef, which is the first agent of the carbacephem class of beta-lactam antibiotics to be developed, provides good activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria. A single-blinded, randomized, parallel clinical trial in 10 centers in the United States compared the efficacy and safety of loracarbef with that of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. A 7-10-day regimen of loracarbef (400 mg twice daily) was as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate (500/125 mg three times a day) and resulted in somewhat fewer side effects. The results of a European trial in Sweden, Finland, and Iceland showed that loracarbef was clinically more effective than doxycycline in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.

摘要

氯碳头孢是首个被研发的碳头孢烯类β-内酰胺抗生素,对多种细菌具有良好的活性。在美国10个中心进行的一项单盲、随机、平行临床试验比较了氯碳头孢与阿莫西林/克拉维酸钾治疗急性细菌性上颌窦炎的疗效和安全性。氯碳头孢7 - 10天疗程(每日两次,每次400毫克)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸(每日三次,每次500/125毫克)疗效相当,且副作用略少。在瑞典、芬兰和冰岛进行的一项欧洲试验结果表明,氯碳头孢在治疗急性细菌性上颌窦炎方面临床疗效优于强力霉素。

相似文献

1
Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: results of U.S. and European comparative therapy trials.急性细菌性上颌窦炎:美国和欧洲对比治疗试验的结果
Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):70S-73S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90611-e.
2
Loracarbef (LY 163892) vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in bacterial maxillary sinusitis.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1992 May;71(5):225-32.
3
Efficacy and safety of loracarbef in the treatment of pneumonia.
Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):65S-69S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90610-n.
4
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性细菌性上颌窦炎患者的临床比较
Am J Med. 1992 Sep;93(3):271-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90232-z.
5
Loracarbef (LY163892) in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: results of U.S. and European comparative clinical trials.
Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):58S-64S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90609-f.
6
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):214-29.
7
Efficacy of clarithromycin vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1993 Dec;72(12):804-10.
8
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media with effusion.
J Pediatr. 1992 Jun;120(6):980-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81974-2.
9
Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefdinir and amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis. Cefdinir Sinusitis Study Group.头孢地尼与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗急性社区获得性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效与安全性比较。头孢地尼鼻窦炎研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Jul;41(7):1517-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.7.1517.
10
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute purulent bacterial bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性化脓性细菌性支气管炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):166-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Loracarbef. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.氯碳头孢。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1993 May;45(5):716-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345050-00008.