• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绝症患者非正式照料者对护理地点和死亡地点的偏好。

Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill.

作者信息

Brazil Kevin, Howell Doris, Bedard Michel, Krueger Paul, Heidebrecht Christine

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):492-9. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1050oa.

DOI:10.1191/0269216305pm1050oa
PMID:16218162
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine informal caregivers perceptions about place of care and place of death; and (2) to identify variables associated with a home death among terminally ill individuals who received in-home support services in a publicly funded home care system.

PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN

A total of 216 informal caregivers participated in a bereavement interview. Data collection included care recipient and informal caregiver characteristics, the use of and satisfaction with community services, and preferences about place of death.

RESULTS

Most caregivers reported that they and the care recipient had a preferred place of death (77 and 68%, respectively) with over 63% reporting home as the preferred place of death. Caregivers had a greater preference for an institutional death (14%) than care recipients (4.7%). While 30% of care recipients did not die in their preferred location, most caregivers (92%) felt, in retrospect, that where the care recipient died was the appropriate place of death. Most caregivers reported being satisfied with the care that was provided. The odds of dying at home were greater when the care recipient stated a preference for place of death (OR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.25, 6.85), and the family physician made home visits during the care recipients last month of life (Univariate odds ratios (OR): 4.42; 95% CI: 1.46, 13.36).

DISCUSSION

The ethic of self-control and choice for the care recipient must be balanced with consideration for the well being of the informal caregiver and responsiveness of the community service system.

摘要

目的

(1)确定非正式照料者对照料地点和死亡地点的看法;(2)识别在公共资助的家庭护理系统中接受居家支持服务的绝症患者中与在家中死亡相关的变量。

参与者与设计

共有216名非正式照料者参与了丧亲访谈。数据收集包括受照料者和非正式照料者的特征、对社区服务的使用情况和满意度,以及对死亡地点的偏好。

结果

大多数照料者报告称他们和受照料者都有一个首选的死亡地点(分别为77%和68%),超过63%的人报告首选在家中死亡。与受照料者(4.7%)相比,照料者更倾向于机构死亡(14%)。虽然30%的受照料者并非在其首选地点死亡,但大多数照料者(92%)事后认为受照料者死亡的地点就是合适的死亡地点。大多数照料者报告对所提供的照料感到满意。当受照料者表明对死亡地点有偏好时,在家中死亡的几率更高(比值比:2.92;95%置信区间:1.25,6.85),并且家庭医生在受照料者生命的最后一个月进行了家访(单变量比值比:4.42;95%置信区间:1.46,13.36)。

讨论

对照料接受者的自我控制和选择伦理必须与对照料者福祉的考虑以及社区服务系统的响应能力相平衡。

相似文献

1
Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill.绝症患者非正式照料者对护理地点和死亡地点的偏好。
Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):492-9. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1050oa.
2
Service preferences among family caregivers of the terminally ill.晚期患者家庭照顾者的服务偏好
J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):69-78. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.69.
3
Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions?姑息治疗中对护理地点和死亡地点的偏好:这是不同的问题吗?
Palliat Med. 2008 Oct;22(7):787-95. doi: 10.1177/0269216308092287. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
4
Discrepancy in the preferences of place of death between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan.台湾晚期癌症患者与其主要家庭照顾者在死亡地点偏好上的差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.006. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
5
Comparing the experiences of rural and urban family caregivers of the terminally ill.比较农村和城市临终患者家庭照料者的经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Jan-Mar;13(1):2250. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
6
Place of death and the differences in patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden.死亡地点与患者死亡质量和临终关怀差异以及照顾者负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):357-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7355. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Preferences for location of death of seriously ill hospitalized patients: perspectives from Canadian patients and their family caregivers.重症住院患者对死亡地点的偏好:来自加拿大患者及其家庭护理人员的观点。
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):85-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216307084612.
8
Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill cancer patients.影响终末期癌症患者在家中死亡的因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010 Apr;10(2):154-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00570.x.
9
The preference of place of death and its predictors among terminally ill patients with cancer and their caregivers in China.中国癌症晚期患者及其照顾者对死亡地点的偏好及其预测因素。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;32(8):835-40. doi: 10.1177/1049909114542647. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
When death is imminent: where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why.当死亡临近时:晚期癌症患者倾向于离世的地点及原因。
Cancer Nurs. 2003 Jun;26(3):245-51. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200306000-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring success in sub-acute hospital-to-home transitions for palliative patients: a descriptive qualitative study.探索姑息治疗患者亚急性医院至家庭过渡阶段的成功经验:一项描述性定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01830-2.
2
Patterns of Health Care Delivery Among Adults With Heart Failure in the Last Year of Life: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.心力衰竭成人患者生命最后一年的医疗服务模式:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e038189. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038189. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Associations Between End-Stage ALS Care and Specialty Palliative Care: A Hypothesis-Generating Study.
终末期肌萎缩侧索硬化症护理与专科姑息治疗之间的关联:一项提出假设的研究。
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Apr;71(4):632-638. doi: 10.1002/mus.28370. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
4
End-of-Life Care Among Patients With Kidney Failure on Maintenance Dialysis: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.维持性透析的肾衰竭患者的临终关怀:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024 Sep 21;11:20543581241280698. doi: 10.1177/20543581241280698. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring the needs and coping strategies of family caregivers taking care of dying patients at home: a field study.探索居家照顾临终患者的家庭照护者的需求和应对策略:一项实地研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Dec 12;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01315-0.
6
Trends and Determinants of Location of Death Due to Colorectal Cancer in the United States : A Nationwide Study.美国结直肠癌死亡地点的趋势和决定因素:一项全国性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1447-1454. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14337-y. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
7
Outcomes of an Acute Palliative Care Unit at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Korea.韩国一家综合癌症中心急性姑息治疗病房的治疗结果。
Palliat Med Rep. 2023 Jan 17;4(1):9-16. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2022.0033. eCollection 2023.
8
Availability of family care resources, type of primary caregiving and home death among the oldest-old: A population-based retrospective cohort study in China.高龄老人的家庭护理资源可及性、主要照护类型与家中死亡情况:一项基于中国人群的回顾性队列研究
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Nov 30;20:101308. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101308. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Death at home versus other locations in older people receiving physician-led home visits: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.在家中与其他地点接受医师主导的居家探访的老年人的死亡:日本的一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022 Dec;22(12):1005-1012. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14496. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
10
Describing settings of care in the last 100 days of life for cancer decedents: a population-based descriptive study.描述癌症逝者生命最后 100 天的照护环境:基于人群的描述性研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4809-4820. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5291. Epub 2022 Oct 24.