Suppr超能文献

高龄老人的家庭护理资源可及性、主要照护类型与家中死亡情况:一项基于中国人群的回顾性队列研究

Availability of family care resources, type of primary caregiving and home death among the oldest-old: A population-based retrospective cohort study in China.

作者信息

Xiong Zihui, Feng Weiyan, Li Zhong

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2022 Nov 30;20:101308. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101308. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Place of death is one of the quality indicators for end-of-life (EOL) care, and most people prefer to die at home. This study investigated the association between availability of family care resources, type of primary caregiving and home death. A sample of 21,677 deceased oldest-old consisting of 5,224 octogenarians, 8,489 nonagenarians, and 7,964 centenarians, was derived from the 1998-2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. Marital status, number of children and living with family members were indicators for the availability of family care resources. After accounting for other covariates, number of children (4-6 vs. 0-3: adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.81 [1.54 to 2.13]; >6 vs. 0-3: 2.63 [2.09 to 3.31]) and living with family members (28.29 [23.89 to 33.49]) were positively associated with informal caregiving (all  < 0.001). Number of children (4-6 vs. 0-3: 1.17 [1.04 to 1.32]; >6 vs. 0-3: 1.19 [1.03 to 1.38]), living with family members (2.52 [2.17 to 2.92]) and informal caregiving (11.43 [9.58 to 13.64] were associated with increased odds of dying at home (all  < 0.05). The association between availability of family care resources (number of children: β [95% CI], % mediated: 0.05 [0.04 to 0.07], 55.6%; living with family members: 0.14 [0.13 to 0.15], 46.7%) and home death was partially mediated by the type of primary caregiving. Our results suggest that the availability of family care resources played a significant role in making home death possible through informal caregiving. Therefore, continuous policy efforts on the different roles of specific family care resources are warranted to train and support family caregivers to facilitate culturally appropriate EOL services, such as dying at preferred place.

摘要

死亡地点是临终关怀的质量指标之一,大多数人希望在家中离世。本研究调查了家庭护理资源的可获得性、主要护理类型与在家中死亡之间的关联。从1998 - 2018年中国健康与养老追踪调查中抽取了21677名已故高龄老人作为样本,其中包括5224名八旬老人、8489名九旬老人和7964名百岁老人。婚姻状况、子女数量以及是否与家庭成员同住是家庭护理资源可获得性的指标。在考虑了其他协变量后,子女数量(4 - 6个 vs. 0 - 3个:调整后的比值比[95%置信区间]:1.81[1.54至2.13];>6个 vs. 0 - 3个:2.63[2.09至3.31])以及与家庭成员同住(28.29[23.89至33.49])与非正式护理呈正相关(均<0.001)。子女数量(4 - 6个 vs. 0 - 3个:1.17[1.04至1.32];>6个 vs. 0 - 3个:1.19[1.03至1.38])、与家庭成员同住(2.52[2.17至2.92])以及非正式护理(11.43[9.58至13.64])与在家中死亡的几率增加相关(均<0.05)。家庭护理资源的可获得性(子女数量:β[95%置信区间],中介比例:0.05[0.04至0.07],55.6%;与家庭成员同住:0.14[0.13至0.15],46.7%)与在家中死亡之间的关联部分由主要护理类型介导。我们的研究结果表明,家庭护理资源的可获得性通过非正式护理在使在家中死亡成为可能方面发挥了重要作用。因此,有必要针对特定家庭护理资源的不同作用持续开展政策努力,以培训和支持家庭护理人员,促进提供符合文化习俗的临终服务,如在 preferred place 离世。 (注:原文中“preferred place”直译为“首选地点”,结合前文推测这里可能就是指“家中”,但由于原文如此,翻译时保留英文。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验