Bannerman E, Yersin M N, Bille J
Swiss National Reference Center for Listeria, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Jun;58(6):2011-5. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.6.2011-2015.1992.
The MICRO-ID LISTERIA system, designed to identify Listeria isolates to species level within 24 h, was compared with conventional biochemical identification. MICRO-ID LISTERIA used in combination with the CAMP test correctly identified 409 (98.8%) of 414 strains isolated from human, animal, food, and environmental sources belonging to the seven species currently defined within the genus Listeria. The kit was easy to use and simple to interpret. However, 8 of the 15 tests (i.e., phenylalanine deaminase, hydrogen sulfide, indole, ornithine decarboxylase, lysine decarboxylase, malonate, urease, and o-nitrophenyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside) were considered superfluous for the differentiation of Listeria spp. The CAMP test was indispensable when using the MICRO-ID LISTERIA system, in particular to differentiate CAMP test-positive L. monocytogenes from the nonhemolytic, rhamnose-positive L. innocua. The hemolytic L. seeligeri and L. ivanovii strains and the nonhemolytic, non-rhamnose-acidifying L. welshimeri strains could also be differentiated from one another only on the basis of their CAMP test results. The very few strains of L. grayi and L. murrayi were easily differentiated from the other nonhemolytic species. Catalase-negative cocci should not be tested, because 12 out of 19 catalase-negative strains (all enterococci) in our test were misidentified as Listeria spp. The MICRO-ID LISTERIA system identified strains within 18 to 24 h and is thus less time-consuming than conventional tests. The system could, therefore, be used together with correctly done CAMP tests for the rapid identification of Listeria isolates, especially food and environmental isolates, for which rapid species differentiation is important.
旨在在24小时内将李斯特菌分离株鉴定到种水平的MICRO-ID李斯特菌系统,与传统生化鉴定方法进行了比较。将MICRO-ID李斯特菌系统与CAMP试验联合使用,正确鉴定了从人、动物、食品和环境来源分离的414株菌株中的409株(98.8%),这些菌株属于李斯特菌属目前定义的七个种。该试剂盒使用方便,结果易于解读。然而,15项试验中的8项(即苯丙氨酸脱氨酶、硫化氢、吲哚、鸟氨酸脱羧酶、赖氨酸脱羧酶、丙二酸盐、尿素酶和邻硝基苯基-β-D-吡喃半乳糖苷)被认为对于李斯特菌属的鉴别是多余的。使用MICRO-ID李斯特菌系统时,CAMP试验是必不可少的,特别是用于区分CAMP试验阳性的单核细胞增生李斯特菌与不溶血、鼠李糖阳性的无害李斯特菌。溶血的斯氏李斯特菌和伊氏李斯特菌菌株以及不溶血、不产鼠李糖酸的威氏李斯特菌菌株也只能根据它们的CAMP试验结果相互区分。很少的格氏李斯特菌和默氏李斯特菌菌株很容易与其他不溶血的种区分开来。不应检测过氧化氢酶阴性的球菌,因为在我们的试验中,19株过氧化氢酶阴性菌株(均为肠球菌)中有12株被错误鉴定为李斯特菌属。MICRO-ID李斯特菌系统在18至24小时内鉴定出菌株,因此比传统试验耗时少。因此,该系统可与正确进行的CAMP试验一起用于快速鉴定李斯特菌分离株,特别是食品和环境分离株,对于这些分离株,快速的种鉴别很重要。