Elrosasy Amr, Hindawi Mahmoud Diaa, Abo Zeid Mohamed, Awad Abdelaziz A, Abbas Ahmed W, Al Diab Al Azzawi Mohammad, Afifi Eslam, Amgad Ahmed, Yasser Mohamed, Sarhan Khalid, Aissa Sara Chikh
Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04557-2.
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) is essential for diagnosing and treating gastrointestinal disorders in children aged 6-12 years, yet it often requires sedation due to the significant discomfort and pain involved. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid (inception to March 30, 2024). Inclusion criteria are as follows: RCTs comparing sedative regimens (e.g., propofol, ketamine, remimazolam, dexmedetomidine) in children undergoing upper GIE. Exclusion criteria are as follows: non-RCTs, studies outside the age range, or non-English publications. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB-2. Data were extracted for recovery time, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events (hypoxia, bradycardia, dizziness). A systematic synthesis of outcomes was performed, with results presented descriptively and quantitatively (e.g., event rates, mean differences) to compare regimens. Nineteen RCTs were included with a total of 1955 patients. Propofol, either alone or in combination, was frequently used. The propofol-ketamine combination showed better hemodynamic stability (92.2 ± 16.8 bpm) compared to propofol-fentanyl (76.8 ± 13.8 bpm). S-ketamine demonstrated dose-dependent effects-0.3 mg/kg provided the shortest recovery time (33.5 min) with moderate dizziness (40.0%)-while 0.5 mg/kg offered optimal heart rate maintenance (93.81 bpm) but longer recovery (35.67 min) and increased dizziness (43.3%). The 0.7 mg/kg dose showed faster recovery than 0.5 mg/kg (33.5 vs 35.67 min), but the highest dizziness rates (73.3%). Post-procedural complications were minimal except for dose-dependent neurological effects with S-ketamine (visual disturbances peaking at 27.6% with 0.3 mg/kg). Remimazolam showed the fastest recovery overall. Adverse events varied by regimen: propofol-ketamine had higher hypoxia (6.8%) and dizziness (34.1%), while propofol-fentanyl showed more bradycardia (24.4%). Overall, remimazolam and dexmedetomidine regimens were linked to fewer complications, though they required careful monitoring for hypotension. However, heterogeneity in outcomes (e.g., recovery times, adverse events) underscores the need for individualized regimen selection. Limitations include variability in study designs and insufficient data on minimal effective doses. Further RCTs should standardize outcome measures and optimize dosing for children undergoing endoscopy.
上消化道内镜检查(GIE)对于诊断和治疗6至12岁儿童的胃肠道疾病至关重要,但由于检查过程中会带来明显不适和疼痛,通常需要进行镇静。我们按照PRISMA 2020标准,对来自PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Ovid(截至2024年3月30日)的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价。纳入标准如下:比较接受上消化道内镜检查的儿童镇静方案(如丙泊酚、氯胺酮、瑞马唑仑、右美托咪定)的随机对照试验。排除标准如下:非随机对照试验、年龄范围以外的研究或非英文出版物。使用Cochrane ROB - 2评估偏倚风险。提取恢复时间、血流动力学参数和不良事件(缺氧、心动过缓、头晕)的数据。对结果进行系统综合分析,以描述性和定量方式(如事件发生率、平均差异)呈现结果,比较不同方案。共纳入19项随机对照试验,涉及1955例患者。丙泊酚单独使用或联合使用的情况较为常见。丙泊酚 - 氯胺酮联合使用与丙泊酚 - 芬太尼相比,显示出更好的血流动力学稳定性(92.2±16.8次/分钟 vs 76.8±13.8次/分钟)。S - 氯胺酮显示出剂量依赖性效应——0.3mg/kg提供最短恢复时间(33.5分钟),中度头晕发生率为40.0%——而0.5mg/kg可维持最佳心率(93.81次/分钟),但恢复时间更长(35.67分钟),头晕发生率增加(43.3%)。0.7mg/kg剂量的恢复速度比0.5mg/kg快(33.5分钟 vs 35.67分钟),但头晕发生率最高(73.3%)。除S - 氯胺酮的剂量依赖性神经效应外(0.3mg/kg时视觉障碍发生率最高达27.6%),术后并发症极少。瑞马唑仑总体恢复最快。不良事件因方案而异:丙泊酚 - 氯胺酮组缺氧发生率较高(6.8%)和头晕发生率较高(34.1%),而丙泊酚 - 芬太尼组心动过缓发生率较高(24.4%)。总体而言,瑞马唑仑和右美托咪定方案的并发症较少,不过需要密切监测低血压情况。然而,结果的异质性(如恢复时间、不良事件)凸显了个性化方案选择的必要性。局限性包括研究设计的可变性以及关于最小有效剂量的数据不足。进一步的随机对照试验应规范结局指标,并优化接受内镜检查儿童的给药方案。