Di Silvestre Mario, Greggi Tiziana, Giacomini Stefano, Cioni Alfredo, Bakaloudis Georgios, Lolli Francesco, Parisini Patrizio
Spine Surgery Department, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):E597-604. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182317.33700.08.
Review of results of patients with Marfan syndrome treated with instrumented posterior fusion alone for scoliosis.
To analyze the results of surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome.
Few studies have been reported in the literature on surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome, analyzing long-term results of posterior instrumented fusion.
Twenty-three patients with Marfan syndrome with a mean age of 17 years (range, 11-31 years) were treated surgically from 1982 to 1995 for scoliosis, using a posterior instrumented fusion alone (Harrington rod with sublaminar wires in the first 16 cases, and a more recent hybrid instrumentation in the remaining 7 cases). All of the patients received a long posterior instrumented fusion, including 12.3 levels on average (range, 9-17), extending the fusion area to vertebrae that were neutral and stable in both coronal and sagittal planes before surgery. Patients were analyzed as two different groups (Group 1 and Group 2) according to the different posterior instrumentations employed: Group 1 included 16 patients treated by the Harrington distraction rod technique with sublaminar wires, while Group 2 included 7 patients treated using more recent hybrid instrumentations. Presentation features, complications, and results were analyzed.
At a minimum follow-up of 7 years (maximum, 18 years), all 23 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 26.8 years (range, 20-38 years). The average preoperative scoliosis value of 69.91 degrees was initially corrected to 38.17 degrees, averaged 40.89 degrees 1 year after surgery, and was finally equal to 44.09 degrees at the last follow-up. Differences in terms of scoliosis correction achieved with different instrumentations (Groups 1 and 2) did not reach statistical significance. In Group 2 patients, the percentage of postoperative correction was slightly lower (44.23%) than that of Group 1 (46.55%) but remained more stable at the last follow-up (40.97% vs. 36.38% of Group 1). There were 11 complications in 10 of the 23 patients (43.4%); two complications occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperatively, dural tears occurred in 2 cases (8.6%). Pseudarthrosis with instrumentation failure in 2 cases (8.6%) required revision surgery. Five (21.7%) distal hook dislodgements with moderate loss of scoliosis correction, 1 (4.3%) mild loss of correction without instrumentation failure, and 1 asymptomatic cervicothoracic junctional kyphosis. did not require surgery. All complications occurred among the 16 Group 1 patients, treated using the Harrington rod instrumentation with sublaminar wires.
These results seemed to demonstrate that a satisfactory stabilization of scoliosis can be achieved by posterior instrumentation alone in patients with Marfan syndrome. Instrumented posterior fusion should be extended to include vertebrae that are neutral and stable in both coronal and sagittal planes before surgery, in order to ensure stabilization of the deformity and reduce the risks of decompensation of the spine.
回顾仅采用后路器械融合治疗脊柱侧凸的马凡综合征患者的结果。
分析马凡综合征脊柱侧凸的手术治疗结果。
关于马凡综合征脊柱侧凸手术治疗并分析后路器械融合长期结果的文献报道较少。
1982年至1995年,23例平均年龄17岁(范围11 - 31岁)的马凡综合征患者因脊柱侧凸接受手术治疗,仅采用后路器械融合(前16例采用哈林顿棒加椎板下钢丝,其余7例采用更新的混合器械)。所有患者均接受长节段后路器械融合,平均包括12.3个节段(范围9 - 17个节段),将融合区域扩展至术前在冠状面和矢状面均为中立且稳定的椎体。根据所采用的不同后路器械,将患者分为两个不同组(第1组和第2组):第1组包括16例采用哈林顿撑开棒技术加椎板下钢丝治疗的患者,而第2组包括7例采用更新的混合器械治疗的患者。分析其临床表现、并发症及结果。
至少随访7年(最长18年)后,对所有23例患者进行了复查。平均年龄为26.8岁(范围20 - 38岁)。术前脊柱侧凸平均度数69.91°最初矫正至38.17°,术后1年平均为40.89°,最后一次随访时最终为44.09°。不同器械(第1组和第2组)在脊柱侧凸矫正方面的差异未达到统计学意义。在第2组患者中,术后矫正百分比略低于第1组(44.23%对比46.55%),但在最后一次随访时保持更稳定(第2组为40.97%,第1组为36.38%)。23例患者中有10例(43.4%)出现11种并发症;1例患者出现2种并发症。术中,2例(8.6%)发生硬脊膜撕裂。2例(8.6%)出现器械相关假关节形成并伴有器械失效,需要翻修手术。5例(21.7%)出现远端钩移位且脊柱侧凸矫正有中度丢失,1例(4.3%)矫正轻度丢失但无器械失效,1例无症状性颈胸交界后凸。均未进行手术。所有并发症均发生在采用哈林顿棒加椎板下钢丝器械治疗的16例第1组患者中。
这些结果似乎表明,仅采用后路器械融合可使马凡综合征患者的脊柱侧凸获得满意的稳定。后路器械融合应扩展至术前在冠状面和矢状面均为中立且稳定的椎体,以确保畸形稳定并降低脊柱失代偿风险。