Meunier O, Hernandez C, Piroird M, Heilig R, Steinbach D, Freyd A
Laboratoire d'hygiène hospitalière, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2005 Sep-Oct;63(5):481-6.
This study tested the efficiency of four different procedures for isolating bacteria found on hospital surfaces. The techniques studied use both rich and poor media with or without enrichment in nutritive broth. The sampling of surfaces in hospital care departments was carried out using a dampened sterile flue brush. Bacteria samples were then placed on TCSA agar plates (method 1) and blood agar plates (GS) (method 2) before immersion in a nutritive broth for enrichment. The following day, the broth was used to produce two new media: TCSA (method 3) and GS (method 4). For each sample, we established the global amount of different bacterial species isolated by all 4 methods combined. These values were then used as a reference to evaluate the efficiency of each technique. 360 smears were carried out, and a total of 718 bacterial strains were isolated. Methods 1 and 2 (without enrichment) permitted the isolation of 10.86 and 13.37% respectively of the total number of strains. Methods 3 and 4, with preliminary enrichment, made it possible to isolate 69.08% of bacterial strains on TCSA medium and 90.53% on GS medium. The combination of the enrichment stage and an enriched culture medium lead to an excellent output that highlights and identifies bacteria isolated from samples taken from hospital surfaces.
本研究测试了四种不同程序用于分离医院表面发现的细菌的效率。所研究的技术使用了富含和贫含营养成分的培养基,有无在营养肉汤中进行富集处理。在医院护理部门使用浸湿的无菌烟道刷对表面进行采样。然后将细菌样本置于TCSA琼脂平板(方法1)和血琼脂平板(GS)(方法2)上,之后浸入营养肉汤中进行富集。第二天,用肉汤制备两种新的培养基:TCSA(方法3)和GS(方法4)。对于每个样本,我们确定了通过所有4种方法联合分离出的不同细菌种类的总量。这些数值随后被用作评估每种技术效率的参考。共进行了360次涂片,总共分离出718株细菌菌株。方法1和2(不进行富集)分别分离出了总菌株数的10.86%和13.37%。方法3和4,经过初步富集,在TCSA培养基上能够分离出69.08%的细菌菌株,在GS培养基上能够分离出90.53%的细菌菌株。富集阶段和富集培养基的结合产生了优异的结果,突出并鉴定了从医院表面采集的样本中分离出的细菌。