Cumbie Sharon, Weinert Clarann, Luparell Susan, Conley Virginia, Smith James
Fay W Whitney School of Nursing, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(3):289-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00049.x.
To report the results of a multidisciplinary, interinstitutional writing support group established to facilitate faculty scholarly productivity. ORGANIZING CONCEPT: The road to scholarship can be filled with many obstacles, among them time constraints, teaching and meeting demands, student needs, office interruptions, and lack of colleagueship. The problems associated with lack of colleagueship, in particular, can be compounded for faculty who work in isolated contexts with few, if any, senior faculty to serve as mentors. METHODS OF DEVELOPMENT: The Western Writers Coercion Group evolved over a 2-year period from a small group of nursing faculty at a single institution to include, by its second year, 21 faculty from five western university campuses and three academic disciplines. The group met biweekly via teleconference with the objectives of defining and accomplishing realistic individual scholarship goals and providing a forum for the critical exchange of ideas.
The ongoing support and mentoring of the group led to significant writing outcomes in the form of manuscripts submitted for publication, abstracts submitted for conference presentation, grant proposals developed, and collegial relationships formed.
Although the benefits of group participation varied somewhat for faculty at different points in the career trajectory, they seemed to accrue at all levels of development. Group members underscored the many less quantifiable advantages of group participation: exposure to broader professional perspectives, the formation of key professional relationships, the enrichment of multidisciplinary input, and individualized assistance with time management, goal setting, and actual drafts.
The structure and experience of this group, which continues to meet regularly, might be a model to guide other groups of scholars who face geographic isolation and who struggle with balancing time and work and finding motivation for the process of writing.
报告一个多学科、跨机构写作支持小组的成果,该小组旨在促进教师的学术产出。
学术之路可能充满诸多障碍,其中包括时间限制、教学和会议要求、学生需求、办公室干扰以及缺乏同事支持。特别是对于那些在孤立环境中工作、几乎没有资深教师作为导师的教师而言,与缺乏同事支持相关的问题可能会更加严重。
西方作家强制小组在两年时间里从一所机构的一小群护理教师发展而来,到第二年,成员包括来自西部五个大学校园和三个学术学科的21名教师。该小组每两周通过电话会议开会,目的是确定并实现切实可行的个人学术目标,并提供一个进行批判性思想交流的论坛。
该小组持续的支持和指导带来了显著的写作成果,形式包括提交发表的手稿、提交会议展示的摘要、撰写的资助提案以及建立的同事关系。
尽管小组参与的益处对于处于职业轨迹不同阶段的教师而言略有不同,但似乎在各个发展阶段都有体现。小组成员强调了小组参与的许多难以量化的优势:接触更广泛的专业视角、建立关键的专业关系、丰富多学科投入,以及在时间管理、目标设定和实际草稿方面提供个性化帮助。
这个仍定期开会的小组的结构和经验,可能为指导其他面临地理隔离、在平衡时间与工作以及寻找写作动力方面苦苦挣扎的学者群体提供一个模式。