Suppr超能文献

卡泊芬净与两性霉素B治疗侵袭性念珠菌病的比较。

Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis.

作者信息

Mora-Duarte Jorge, Betts Robert, Rotstein Coleman, Colombo Arnaldo Lopes, Thompson-Moya Luis, Smietana Juanita, Lupinacci Robert, Sable Carole, Kartsonis Nicholas, Perfect John

机构信息

Neeman-ICIC and Hospital Mexico, C.C.S.S., San José, Costa Rica.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):2020-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021585.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caspofungin is an echinocandin agent with fungicidal activity against candida species. We performed a double-blind trial to compare caspofungin with amphotericin B deoxycholate for the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis.

METHODS

We enrolled patients who had clinical evidence of infection and a positive culture for candida species from blood or another site. Patients were stratified according to the severity of disease, as indicated by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, and the presence or absence of neutropenia and were randomly assigned to receive either caspofungin or amphotericin B. The study was designed to compare the efficacy of caspofungin with that of amphotericin B in patients with invasive candidiasis and in a subgroup with candidemia.

RESULTS

Of the 239 patients enrolled, 224 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Base-line characteristics, including the percentage of patients with neutropenia and the mean APACHE II score, were similar in the two treatment groups. A modified intention-to-treat analysis showed that the efficacy of caspofungin was similar to that of amphotericin B, with successful outcomes in 73.4 percent of the patients treated with caspofungin and in 61.7 percent of those treated with amphotericin B (difference after adjustment for APACHE II score and neutropenic status, 12.7 percentage points; 95.6 percent confidence interval, -0.7 to 26.0). An analysis of patients who met prespecified criteria for evaluation showed that caspofungin was superior, with a favorable response in 80.7 percent of patients, as compared with 64.9 percent of those who received amphotericin B (difference, 15.4 percentage points; 95.6 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 29.7). Caspofungin was as effective as amphotericin B in patients who had candidemia, with a favorable response in 71.7 percent and 62.8 percent of patients, respectively (difference, 10.0 percentage points; 95.0 percent confidence interval, -4.5 to 24.5). There were significantly fewer drug-related adverse events in the caspofungin group than in the amphotericin B group.

CONCLUSIONS

Caspofungin is at least as effective as amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and, more specifically, candidemia.

摘要

背景

卡泊芬净是一种棘白菌素类药物,对念珠菌属具有杀菌活性。我们进行了一项双盲试验,比较卡泊芬净与两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐用于侵袭性念珠菌病的初始治疗。

方法

我们纳入了有感染临床证据且血液或其他部位念珠菌属培养阳性的患者。根据急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分所显示的疾病严重程度以及是否存在中性粒细胞减少对患者进行分层,并随机分配接受卡泊芬净或两性霉素B治疗。该研究旨在比较卡泊芬净与两性霉素B在侵袭性念珠菌病患者以及念珠菌血症亚组患者中的疗效。

结果

在纳入的239例患者中,224例纳入了改良意向性分析。两个治疗组的基线特征相似,包括中性粒细胞减少患者的百分比以及平均APACHE II评分。改良意向性分析显示,卡泊芬净的疗效与两性霉素B相似,接受卡泊芬净治疗的患者中有73.4%获得成功结局,接受两性霉素B治疗的患者中有61.7%获得成功结局(校正APACHE II评分和中性粒细胞减少状态后的差异为12.7个百分点;95.6%置信区间为-0.7至26.0)。对符合预先设定评估标准的患者进行的分析显示,卡泊芬净更具优势,80.7%的患者有良好反应,而接受两性霉素B治疗的患者中这一比例为64.9%(差异为15.4个百分点;95.6%置信区间为1.1至29.7)。在念珠菌血症患者中,卡泊芬净与两性霉素B的疗效相当,分别有71.7%和62.8%的患者有良好反应(差异为10.0个百分点;95.0%置信区间为-4.5至24.5)。卡泊芬净组与药物相关的不良事件明显少于两性霉素B组。

结论

卡泊芬净在治疗侵袭性念珠菌病,尤其是念珠菌血症方面至少与两性霉素B同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验