Clark T Justin, Neelakantan Deepa, Gupta Janesh K
Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Apr 1;125(2):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
To identify current management practices and evaluate subsequent outcomes of treatment for women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia.
All women with a histological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia at the Birmingham Women's Hospital were identified between October 1998 and September 2000. A retrospective case note review was performed for each woman using a standardised data abstraction sheet. Baseline characteristics including clinical presentation and treatment strategy were obtained. Results of subsequent endometrial tissue examinations were used to assess histological response to treatment and the need and indication for hysterectomy was used to assess clinical response.
There were 351 women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia during the study period of which 84% presented with symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding and 54% were postmenopausal. Complex endometrial hyperplasia was the most common diagnosis accounting for 60% of all cases. Eighty percent of women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia were treated by hysterectomy compared with 30% without evidence of cytological atypia (relative hysterectomy rate of 2.6, 95% CI 2.0-3.3). Hysterectomy was avoided in 138/172 (80%, 95% CI 74-86%) women managed conservatively during the study period. Overall 35/108 (36%, 95% CI 27-46%) of women managed conservatively had persistent or progressive disease identified (mean follow up 36 months). 20/143 (14%) women initially diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia who subsequently underwent hysterectomy were found to have endometrial cancer, the majority of whom had been diagnosed with atypical disease (14/20, 70%).
CONCLUSION(S): The majority of women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia were managed by hysterectomy and the substantial risk of diagnostic under-call supports this approach to treatment. In contrast, there is no consensus regarding the initial management of women with endometrial hyperplasia without cytological atypia.
确定目前对于诊断为子宫内膜增生的女性的管理方法,并评估后续治疗结果。
在1998年10月至2000年9月期间,识别出在伯明翰妇女医院组织学诊断为子宫内膜增生的所有女性。使用标准化数据提取表对每位女性进行回顾性病例记录审查。获取包括临床表现和治疗策略在内的基线特征。使用后续子宫内膜组织检查结果评估对治疗的组织学反应,并使用子宫切除术的必要性和指征评估临床反应。
在研究期间有351名女性被诊断为子宫内膜增生,其中84%出现异常子宫出血症状,54%为绝经后女性。复杂性子宫内膜增生是最常见的诊断,占所有病例的60%。80%有非典型子宫内膜增生的女性接受了子宫切除术,而无细胞学非典型证据的女性这一比例为30%(相对子宫切除率为2.6,95%可信区间2.0 - 3.3)。在研究期间,138/172(80%,95%可信区间74 - 86%)接受保守治疗的女性避免了子宫切除术。总体而言,108名接受保守治疗的女性中有35/108(36%,95%可信区间27 - 46%)被确定患有持续性或进展性疾病(平均随访36个月)。最初诊断为子宫内膜增生且随后接受子宫切除术的20/143(14%)女性被发现患有子宫内膜癌,其中大多数被诊断为非典型疾病(14/20,70%)。
大多数有非典型子宫内膜增生的女性接受了子宫切除术,诊断漏诊的巨大风险支持了这种治疗方法。相比之下,对于无细胞学非典型的子宫内膜增生女性的初始管理尚无共识。