Jardim Marcia R, Antunes Sergio L G, Simons Brian, Wildenbeest Joanne G, Nery José Augusto C, Illarramendi Ximena, Moraes Milton O, Martinez Alejandra N, Oskam Linda, Faber William R, Sarno Euzenir N, Sampaio Elizabeth P, Bührer-Sékula Samira
Leprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lepr Rev. 2005 Sep;76(3):232-40.
Pure neural leprosy (PNL) is difficult to diagnose because skin lesions and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in slit smears are absent. At present, the gold standard for PNL diagnosis is the histopathological examination of a peripheral nerve biopsy. Even so, detection of bacteria is difficult and histological findings may be non-specific. Furthermore, nerve biopsy is an invasive procedure that is only possible in specialized centres. Therefore, there is a need for additional diagnostic methods that may help to confirm the clinical diagnosis of PNL. In the present study, an additional laboratory test, the ELISA for anti-phenolic glycolipid I (PGL-I) IgM antibodies, was performed on 103 individuals with clinical and neurophysiological signs of peripheral neuropathy, of which 67 were diagnosed as PNL patients and 36 remained as 'not diagnosed as PNL', as well as on a control group of 34 patients with other neurological diseases. An antibody response was present in 14/67 (21%) of the patients diagnosed as PNL as compared with 3/34 (9%) of controls. Anti-PGL-I positivity was observed in 5/8 (63%) of the AFB positive cases. Patients whose diagnosis was confirmed solely by Mycobacterium leprae PCR on the nerve sample had 4/25 (16%) seropositivity. In addition, anti-PGL-I antibodies were detected in 9/40 (23%) of the PNL patients who were PCR negative for M. leprae DNA. Moreover, two patients who showed clinical and eletrophysiological manifestations suggestive of PNL were diagnosed with the help of their positive test results in the anti-PGL-I ELISA. In conclusion, detection of antibodies against PGL-I in patients with peripheral neuropathy is useful as an additional laboratory test to help PNL diagnosis.
纯神经型麻风(PNL)难以诊断,因为皮肤病变及涂片抗酸杆菌(AFB)均不存在。目前,PNL诊断的金标准是周围神经活检的组织病理学检查。即便如此,细菌检测困难,组织学结果可能不具特异性。此外,神经活检是一种侵入性操作,仅在专业中心可行。因此,需要其他诊断方法来辅助PNL的临床诊断。在本研究中,对103例有临床及神经生理学周围神经病变体征的个体进行了一项额外的实验室检测,即抗酚糖脂I(PGL-I)IgM抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),其中67例被诊断为PNL患者,36例仍为“未诊断为PNL”,同时对34例患有其他神经系统疾病的患者组成的对照组也进行了检测。与对照组34例中的3例(9%)相比,在诊断为PNL的患者中有14/67例(21%)出现抗体反应。在AFB阳性病例中有5/8例(63%)观察到抗PGL-I阳性。仅通过神经样本的麻风分枝杆菌PCR确诊的患者中有4/25例(16%)血清反应阳性。此外,在麻风分枝杆菌DNA PCR阴性的PNL患者中有9/40例(23%)检测到抗PGL-I抗体。此外,两名表现出提示PNL的临床和电生理表现的患者,借助其抗PGL-I ELISA检测的阳性结果得以确诊。总之,检测周围神经病变患者的抗PGL-I抗体作为一项额外的实验室检测有助于PNL的诊断。