Williams P G, Wiebe D J, Smith T W
Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112.
J Behav Med. 1992 Jun;15(3):237-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00845354.
Hardiness has been hypothesized to moderate the impact of stress on health by influencing coping responses, but little attention has been focused upon these associations. This study examined the relationship among hardiness, coping, and illness while attending to recent criticisms of the hardiness literature including the potential overlap with neuroticism, whether hardiness is a unitary construct, and the predominant use of male samples. Hardiness was found to be positively related to adaptive coping variables and negatively related to maladaptive coping variables. Problem-focused, support-seeking, and avoidant coping were found to mediate the hardiness-illness relationship. Although these hardiness-coping relationships were partially independent of the influence of neuroticism, the relationship of both coping and hardiness with self-reported illness appeared to result from the common influence of neuroticism. Consistent with previous research, the commitment and control components correlated most consistently with coping variables, and predicted hardiness effects were most consistently demonstrated for males.
有人提出,坚韧人格通过影响应对方式来减轻压力对健康的影响,但这些关联很少受到关注。本研究考察了坚韧人格、应对方式与疾病之间的关系,同时关注近期对坚韧人格文献的批评,包括其与神经质的潜在重叠、坚韧人格是否为单一结构,以及主要使用男性样本的问题。研究发现,坚韧人格与适应性应对变量呈正相关,与适应不良应对变量呈负相关。以问题为中心的应对、寻求支持的应对和回避应对被发现介导了坚韧人格与疾病的关系。尽管这些坚韧人格与应对方式的关系部分独立于神经质的影响,但应对方式和坚韧人格与自我报告疾病的关系似乎是由神经质的共同影响导致的。与先前的研究一致,承诺和控制成分与应对变量的相关性最为一致,并且在男性中最一致地证明了预测的坚韧人格效应。