Hassanein Kamal Abdel-Aal Mohamed, Musgrove Brian T, Bradbury Eileen
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;33(6):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
Traditionally health-care providers have measured outcome of treatment of disease by focusing on tumour response and disease-free survival. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the behavioural and functional impact of treatment on the patient is important. This study investigates the psychological outcome and its relationship with functional status and coping mechanisms following treatment of oral cancer patients.
Sixty-eight patients were evaluated 6 months to 6 years after treatment (from October 1992 to October 1997) for oral cancer. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used for psychological evaluation, the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) and The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) for evaluating the head and neck specific and general functional status, respectively. Finally, the "Mental Adjustment to Cancer Questionnaire" (MAC-Q) was used for evaluation of coping mechanisms.
The incidence of anxiety and/or depression was 25% and the socio-demographic and medical characteristics showed poor correlation with the psychological outcome in this study. The results indicated that there was a strong association between psychological outcome and head and neck specific and general quality-of-life (QOL) domains, and style of coping. The p-value was less than 0.01 for most of the domains and items of functional status and the effective coping style.
Deteriorated functional status and ineffective coping strategies are strongly associated with poor psychological outcome in patients with oral cancer.
传统上,医疗服务提供者通过关注肿瘤反应和无病生存期来衡量疾病的治疗结果。然而,越来越明显的是,治疗对患者的行为和功能影响很重要。本研究调查口腔癌患者治疗后的心理结果及其与功能状态和应对机制的关系。
对68例口腔癌患者在治疗后6个月至6年(从1992年10月至1997年10月)进行评估。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)进行心理评估,分别使用华盛顿大学生活质量问卷(UW-QOL)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)评估头颈部特定功能状态和一般功能状态。最后,使用“癌症心理适应问卷”(MAC-Q)评估应对机制。
焦虑和/或抑郁的发生率为25%,在本研究中,社会人口统计学和医学特征与心理结果的相关性较差。结果表明,心理结果与头颈部特定和一般生活质量(QOL)领域以及应对方式之间存在密切关联。对于大多数功能状态领域和项目以及有效的应对方式,p值均小于0.01。
功能状态恶化和应对策略无效与口腔癌患者不良的心理结果密切相关。