Bauer Edith, Derfler Kurt, Joukhadar Christian, Druml Wilfred
Division of Nephrology, Medical Department III, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Nov;46(5):903-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.041.
Regional anticoagulation using sodium citrate is used increasingly in hemodialysis patients at high risk for bleeding. However, citrate metabolism has never been evaluated systematically in hemodialysis patients, and it remains to be shown that citrate is cleared adequately in the presence of renal dysfunction. This study compares the pharmacokinetics of citrate in hemodialysis patients with minimal residual function with that in patients with normal renal function.
Long-term hemodialysis patients (n = 7) and patients without renal failure (n = 11) were investigated during routine immunoadsorption treatment by using a standardized citrate infusion protocol. Serial analysis of blood samples was performed before, during, and up to 120 minutes after citrate infusion (0.33 mmol/kg/h). Citrate plasma concentrations were measured colorimetrically. In addition, ionized calcium, pH, and bicarbonate were measured by using a blood gas analyzer.
Basal (0.09 +/- 0.03 versus 0.12 +/- 0.03 mmol/L; P = not significant) and peak citrate concentrations were similar in both groups (1.24 +/- 0.42 versus 1.19 +/- 0.33 mmol/L; P = not significant). Citrate clearance was similar in patients with renal failure (0.31 +/- 0.06 L/min) and controls (0.35 +/- 0.11 L/min; P = 0.47). Effects on pH were minimal and did not differ between groups. No patient developed complications from citrate infusion.
Compared with controls, citrate clearance and metabolism in long-term hemodialysis patients is not impaired, and no significant acid-base disorder occurred during citrate anticoagulation. From these data, it is tempting to conclude that citrate anticoagulation can be used safely in patients with chronic renal failure on regular hemodialysis therapy.
对于出血风险高的血液透析患者,使用柠檬酸钠进行局部抗凝的情况越来越多。然而,从未对血液透析患者的柠檬酸盐代谢进行过系统评估,并且在存在肾功能不全的情况下,柠檬酸盐是否能充分清除仍有待证实。本研究比较了残余肾功能极小的血液透析患者与肾功能正常患者体内柠檬酸盐的药代动力学。
在常规免疫吸附治疗期间,采用标准化的柠檬酸盐输注方案,对长期血液透析患者(n = 7)和无肾衰竭患者(n = 11)进行研究。在柠檬酸盐输注前、输注期间以及输注后长达120分钟(0.33 mmol/kg/h),对血样进行系列分析。采用比色法测定血浆柠檬酸盐浓度。此外,使用血气分析仪测量离子钙、pH值和碳酸氢盐。
两组的基础柠檬酸盐浓度(0.09±0.03对0.12±0.03 mmol/L;P = 无显著差异)和峰值柠檬酸盐浓度相似(1.24±0.42对1.19±0.33 mmol/L;P = 无显著差异)。肾衰竭患者(0.31±0.06 L/min)和对照组(0.35±0.11 L/min;P = 0.47)的柠檬酸盐清除率相似。对pH值的影响极小,且两组之间无差异。没有患者因柠檬酸盐输注出现并发症。
与对照组相比,长期血液透析患者的柠檬酸盐清除和代谢未受损,且在柠檬酸盐抗凝期间未发生明显的酸碱紊乱。根据这些数据,很容易得出结论,在接受定期血液透析治疗的慢性肾衰竭患者中,可以安全地使用柠檬酸盐抗凝。