Suppr超能文献

利用HOMERUS试验数据对临床试验随机化技术的比较

Comparison of randomization techniques for clinical trials with data from the HOMERUS-trial.

作者信息

Verberk W J, Kroon A A, Kessels A G H, Nelemans P J, Van Ree J W, Lenders J W M, Thien T, Bakx J C, Van Montfrans G A, Smit A J, Beltman F W, De Leeuw P W

机构信息

University Hospital Maastricht, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2005;14(5):306-14. doi: 10.1080/08037050500331538.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several methods of randomization are available to create comparable intervention groups in a study. In the HOMERUS-trial, we compared the minimization procedure with a stratified and a non-stratified method of randomization in order to test which one is most appropriate for use in clinical hypertension trials. A second objective of this article was to describe the baseline characteristics of the HOMERUS-trial.

METHODS

The HOMERUS population consisted of 459 mild-to-moderate hypertensive subjects (54% males) with a mean age of 55 years. These patients were prospectively randomized with the minimization method to either the office pressure (OP) group, where antihypertensive treatment was based on office blood pressure (BP) values, or to the self-pressure (SP) group, where treatment was based on self-measured BP values. Minimization was compared with two other randomization methods, which were performed post-hoc: (i) non-stratified randomization with four permuted blocks, and (ii) stratified randomization with four permuted blocks and 16 strata. In addition, several factors that could influence outcome were investigated for their effect on BP by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

RESULTS

Minimization and stratified randomization did not lead to significant differences in 24-h ABPM values between the two treatment groups. Non-stratified randomization resulted in a significant difference in 24-h diastolic ABPM between the groups. Factors that caused significant differences in 24-h ABPM values were: region, centre of patient recruitment, age, gender, microalbuminuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and obesity.

CONCLUSION

Minimization and stratified randomization are appropriate methods for use in clinical trials. Many outcome factors should be taken into account for their potential influence on BP levels. Recommendation. Due to the large number of potential outcome factors that can influence BP levels, minimization should be the preferred method for use in clinical hypertension trials, as it has the potential to randomize more outcome factors than stratified randomization.

摘要

背景

在一项研究中,有几种随机化方法可用于创建可比的干预组。在HOMERUS试验中,我们将最小化法与分层随机化法和非分层随机化法进行了比较,以测试哪种方法最适合用于临床高血压试验。本文的第二个目的是描述HOMERUS试验的基线特征。

方法

HOMERUS研究人群包括459名轻度至中度高血压患者(54%为男性),平均年龄55岁。这些患者采用最小化法前瞻性随机分为诊室血压(OP)组,该组降压治疗基于诊室血压(BP)值,或自我血压(SP)组,该组治疗基于自测BP值。将最小化法与另外两种随机化方法进行事后比较:(i)采用四个置换区组的非分层随机化,以及(ii)采用四个置换区组和16个分层的分层随机化。此外,通过24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)研究了几个可能影响结果的因素对血压的影响。

结果

最小化法和分层随机化法在两个治疗组的24小时ABPM值上未导致显著差异。非分层随机化法导致两组间24小时舒张压ABPM存在显著差异。导致24小时ABPM值存在显著差异的因素有:地区、患者招募中心以及年龄、性别、微量白蛋白尿、左心室肥厚和肥胖。

结论

最小化法和分层随机化法是适用于临床试验的方法。应考虑许多结果因素对血压水平的潜在影响。建议:由于有大量可能影响血压水平的潜在结果因素,最小化法应是临床高血压试验的首选方法,因为它比分层随机化法有可能使更多结果因素随机化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验