Campbell Stephen M, Roland Martin O, Middleton Elizabeth, Reeves David
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL.
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1121. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38632.611123.AE. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
To measure changes in quality of care for three major chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, asthma, and type 2 diabetes) between 1998 and 2003.
Longitudinal cohort study.
42 general practices in six geographical areas of England (Avon, Bury/Rochdale, Enfield, Oldham, Somerset, South Essex).
Medical record data for 2300 patients with diabetes, asthma, or coronary heart disease in 1998, and 1495 patients in 2003.
Quality of care assessed against predefined evidence based review criteria.
Between 1998 and 2003, quality of care improved markedly in terms of maximum possible scores on the review criteria, from 60.5% to 78.1% for coronary heart disease (change = 17.6, 95% confidence interval 13.9 to 21.4; P < 0.001), 60.1% to 70.3% for asthma (10.2, 4.6 to 15.8; P = 0.001), and 70.4% to 77.7% for diabetes (7.3, 3.5 to 11.1; P = 0.001). Important changes occurred to several indicators potentially related to improved health outcomes. These included improved control of serum cholesterol (to < or = 5 mmol/l) from 17.6% to 61.4% in coronary heart disease and from 21.5% to 52% in diabetes and control of blood pressure to < or = 150/90 in coronary heart disease from 47.3% to 72.2% and to < or = 145/85 in diabetes from 21.8% to 35.8%. A small, non-significant improvement in glycaemic control occurred among diabetic patients (37.9% to 39.7% with HbA1c < 7.4%). Significant improvements also occurred in the recording of exercise capacity and diet and weight advice for patients with coronary heart disease; of smoking advice, peak flow, and symptoms for patients with asthma; and of creatinine, weight, and HbA(1c) for patients with diabetes. Over the five years, more improvement in coronary heart disease care occurred in large practices and practices in affluent areas.
Substantial improvements were seen in quality of care for the three conditions studied between 1998 and 2003, a time of systematic quality improvement initiatives in the NHS. The changes were most marked for coronary heart disease. English general practices could be expected to achieve high clinical quality scores in the initial year of a new contact, which provides financial incentives for high quality care from 2004.
测量1998年至2003年间三种主要慢性病(冠心病、哮喘和2型糖尿病)的医疗质量变化。
纵向队列研究。
英格兰六个地理区域的42家普通诊所(埃文、伯里/罗奇代尔、恩菲尔德、奥尔德姆、萨默塞特、南埃塞克斯)。
1998年2300例糖尿病、哮喘或冠心病患者的病历数据,以及2003年1495例患者的病历数据。
根据预先确定的循证审查标准评估医疗质量。
1998年至2003年间,根据审查标准的最高可能得分,医疗质量有显著改善,冠心病从60.5%提高到78.1%(变化=17.6,95%置信区间13.9至21.4;P<0.001),哮喘从60.1%提高到70.3%(10.2,4.6至15.8;P=0.001),糖尿病从70.4%提高到77.7%(7.3,3.5至11.1;P=0.001)。与改善健康结局潜在相关的几个指标发生了重要变化。这些变化包括冠心病患者血清胆固醇控制在≤5 mmol/l的比例从17.6%提高到61.4%,糖尿病患者从21.5%提高到52%;冠心病患者血压控制在≤150/90的比例从47.3%提高到72.2%,糖尿病患者血压控制在≤145/85的比例从21.8%提高到35.8%。糖尿病患者的血糖控制有小幅但不显著的改善(糖化血红蛋白<7.4%的患者从37.9%提高到39.7%)。冠心病患者运动能力记录、饮食和体重建议方面也有显著改善;哮喘患者吸烟建议、峰值流量和症状记录方面有显著改善;糖尿病患者肌酐、体重和糖化血红蛋白记录方面有显著改善。在这五年中,大型诊所和富裕地区诊所的冠心病护理改善更多。
1998年至2003年间,在所研究的三种疾病的医疗质量方面有显著改善,这是英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)开展系统性质量改进举措的时期。冠心病的变化最为显著。预计英国普通诊所在新接触的第一年就能取得较高的临床质量评分,从2004年起这将为高质量护理提供经济激励。