Zota A, Adamkiewicz G, Levy J I, Spengler J D
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Indoor Air. 2005 Dec;15(6):393-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00375.x.
Although elevated nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposures may exacerbate asthma, few studies have examined indoor NO2 levels in low-income, urban neighborhoods, where asthma prevalence is high. As part of the Healthy Public Housing Initiative, NO2 was measured in 77 homes within three Boston public housing developments, using Palmes tubes placed in the kitchen, living room, and outdoors. Air exchange rates (AERs) were assessed using a perfluorocarbon tracer technique. Overall NO2 levels were [mean (ppb)+/-s.d.]: kitchen (43+/-20, n=100), living room (36+/-17, n=102), outdoor (19+/-6, n=91). Indoor NO2 levels were significantly higher in the heating season (living room: 43 ppb vs. 26 ppb, kitchen: 50 ppb vs. 33 ppb), while AERs were significantly lower in the heating season (medians 0.49/h vs. 0.85/h). Significant univariate predictors of indoor concentrations include: outdoor NO2 levels, AERs, and occupancy. AERs and outdoor NO2 remained significant in multivariate models (P<0.05). A dummy variable for supplemental heating with gas stove was not significant (P=0.14), but had a large, positive coefficient. Indoor NO2 levels in this cohort are higher than those generally reported in residential US settings, associated in part with increased gas stove usage and decreased AERs during the heating season.
Indoor air quality is mainly a function of outdoor concentrations, indoor sources, ventilation, and residential behavior. Indoor exposures to nitrogen dioxide and other combustion pollutants may be elevated within low-income housing developments due to the presence of multiple sources, poor ventilation, small apartment size, and behavioral responses to apartment conditions (e.g. supplemental heating with gas stove). This information may be used by housing authorities and other landlords to decrease potential environmental stressors, through interventions such as source substitution and improved ventilation, particularly for sensitive sub-populations such as asthmatics.
尽管接触高浓度二氧化氮(NO₂)可能会加重哮喘病情,但很少有研究调查过哮喘患病率较高的低收入城市社区的室内二氧化氮水平。作为“健康公共住房倡议”的一部分,在波士顿三个公共住房开发区的77户家庭中,使用放置在厨房、客厅和室外的帕尔姆斯管测量了二氧化氮。使用全氟化碳示踪技术评估了空气交换率(AER)。二氧化氮总体水平为[平均值(ppb)±标准差]:厨房(43±20,n = 100),客厅(36±17,n = 102),室外(19±6,n = 91)。供暖季节室内二氧化氮水平显著更高(客厅:43 ppb对26 ppb,厨房:50 ppb对33 ppb),而供暖季节空气交换率显著更低(中位数0.49/小时对0.85/小时)。室内浓度的显著单变量预测因素包括:室外二氧化氮水平、空气交换率和居住人数。空气交换率和室外二氧化氮在多变量模型中仍然显著(P<0.05)。使用燃气炉补充供暖的虚拟变量不显著(P = 0.14),但系数为大的正数。该队列中的室内二氧化氮水平高于美国住宅环境中通常报告的水平,部分原因是供暖季节燃气炉使用增加和空气交换率降低。
室内空气质量主要取决于室外浓度、室内源、通风和居住行为。由于存在多种来源、通风不良、公寓面积小以及对公寓条件的行为反应(例如使用燃气炉补充供暖),低收入住房开发区内室内接触二氧化氮和其他燃烧污染物的水平可能会升高。住房当局和其他房东可利用这些信息,通过源替代和改善通风等干预措施,减少潜在的环境压力源,特别是对于哮喘患者等敏感亚人群。