Yoshikawa Tomoko, Yamazaki Shin, Menaker Michael
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22903, USA.
J Biol Rhythms. 2005 Dec;20(6):500-12. doi: 10.1177/0748730405280775.
The phases of central (SCN) and peripheral circadian oscillators are held in specific relationships under LD cycles but, in the absence of external rhythmic input, may damp or drift out of phase with each other. Rats exposed to prolonged constant light become behaviorally arrhythmic, perhaps as a consequence of dissociation of phases among SCN cells. The authors asked whether individual central and peripheral circadian oscillators were rhythmic in LL-treated arrhythmic rats and, if rhythmic, what were the phase relationships between them. The authors prepared SCN, pineal gland, pituitary, and cornea cultures from transgenic Period1-luciferaserats whose body temperature and locomotor activity were arrhythmic and from several groups of rhythmic rats held in LD, DD, and short-term LL. The authors measured mPer1gene expression by recording light output with sensitive photomultipliers. Most of the cultures from all groups displayed circadian rhythms. This could reflect persistent rhythmicity in vivo prior to culture or, alternatively, rhythmicity that may have been initiated by the culture procedure. To test this, the authors cultured tissues at 2 different times 12 h apart and asked whether phase of the rhythm was related to culture time. The pineal, pituitary, and SCN cultures showed partial or complete dependence of phase on culture time, while peak phases of the cornea cultures were independent of culture time in rhythmic rats and were randomly distributed regardless of culture time in arrhythmic animals. These results suggest that in behaviorally arrhythmic rats, oscillators in the pineal, pituitary, and SCN had been arrhythmic or severely damped in vivo, while the cornea oscillator was free running. The peak phases of the SCN cultures were particularly sensitive to some aspect of the culture procedure since rhythmicity of SCN cultures from robustly rhythmic LD-entrained rats was strongly influenced when the procedure was carried out at any time except the 2nd half of the day.
在光暗(LD)循环条件下,中枢(视交叉上核,SCN)和外周生物钟振荡器的相位保持着特定的关系,但在没有外部节律性输入的情况下,它们可能会衰减或彼此失相。暴露于长时间持续光照下的大鼠会出现行为性节律紊乱,这可能是SCN细胞间相位解离的结果。作者们探究了在持续光照处理导致行为节律紊乱的大鼠中,单个中枢和外周生物钟振荡器是否仍具有节律性,如果有节律,它们之间的相位关系是怎样的。作者们从体温和运动活动均无节律的转基因Period1-荧光素酶大鼠以及几组处于光暗循环(LD)、持续黑暗(DD)和短期持续光照(LL)条件下的有节律大鼠中,制备了SCN、松果体、垂体和角膜培养物。作者们通过用灵敏的光电倍增管记录光输出,来测量mPer1基因的表达。所有组的大多数培养物都显示出昼夜节律。这可能反映了培养前体内持续的节律性,或者也可能是由培养过程引发的节律性。为了验证这一点,作者们在相隔12小时的两个不同时间培养组织,并询问节律的相位是否与培养时间有关。松果体、垂体和SCN培养物的相位显示出部分或完全依赖于培养时间,而在有节律的大鼠中,角膜培养物的峰值相位与培养时间无关,并且在节律紊乱的动物中,无论培养时间如何,其相位都是随机分布的。这些结果表明,在行为节律紊乱的大鼠中,松果体、垂体和SCN中的振荡器在体内已经无节律或严重衰减,而角膜振荡器则是自主运行的。SCN培养物的峰值相位对培养过程的某些方面特别敏感,因为当在一天中除后半段时间之外的任何时间进行该过程时,来自节律稳定的LD同步大鼠的SCN培养物的节律性会受到强烈影响。