Bakker-Zierikzee Astrid M, Alles Martine S, Knol Jan, Kok Frans J, Tolboom Jules J M, Bindels Jacques G
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Br J Nutr. 2005 Nov;94(5):783-90. doi: 10.1079/bjn20051451.
Adding prebiotics or probiotics to infant formula to improve the intestinal flora of formula-fed infants is considered to be a major innovation. Several companies have brought relevant formulations onto the market. However, comparative data on the effects of pre- and probiotics on the intestinal microflora of infants are not available. The present study aimed to compare the effects of infant formula containing a mixture of galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides or viable Bifidobacterium animalis on the composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal microflora. Before birth, infants were randomised and double blindly allocated to one of three formulas. The prebiotic (GOS/FOS) group (n 19) received regular infant formula supplemented with a mixture of galacto-oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides (6 g/l). The probiotic (Bb-12) group (n 19) received the same formula supplemented with 6.0x10(10) viable cells of B. animalis per litre. The standard group (n 19) received non-supplemented regular formula. A group of sixty-three breast-fed infants was included as a reference group. Faecal samples were taken at postnatal day 5 and 10, and week 4, 8, 12 and 16. Compared with the groups fed Bb-12 and standard formula, the GOS/FOS formula group showed higher faecal acetate ratio (69.7 % (sem 2.7), 69.9 % (sem 3.9) and 82.2 % (sem 5.3); P<0.05) and lactate concentration (11.3 (sem 7.9), 3.1 (sem 2.3) and 34.7 (sem 10.7) mmol/kg faeces) and lower pH (6.6 (sem 0.2), 7.1 (sem 0.2) and 5.6 (sem 0.2); P<0.05) at 16 weeks. Differences in percentage of bifidobacteria between the GOS/FOS (59.2 % (sem 7.7)), Bb-12 (52.7 % (sem 8.0)) and the standard (51.8 % (sem 6.4)) groups were not statistically significant at 16 weeks. Feeding infants GOS/FOS formula resulted in a similar effect on metabolic activity of the flora as in breast-fed infants. In the Bb-12 group, composition and metabolic activity of the flora were more similar to those of the standard group.
在婴儿配方奶粉中添加益生元或益生菌以改善人工喂养婴儿的肠道菌群被认为是一项重大创新。几家公司已将相关配方产品推向市场。然而,关于益生元和益生菌对婴儿肠道微生物群影响的比较数据尚不可得。本研究旨在比较含有低聚半乳糖和低聚果糖混合物或活性动物双歧杆菌的婴儿配方奶粉对肠道微生物群组成和代谢活性的影响。出生前,将婴儿随机双盲分配到三种配方奶粉之一。益生元(GOS/FOS)组(n = 19)接受添加了低聚半乳糖和低聚果糖混合物(6 g/l)的常规婴儿配方奶粉。益生菌(Bb - 12)组(n = 19)接受添加了每升6.0×10¹⁰个动物双歧杆菌活细胞的相同配方奶粉。标准组(n = 19)接受未添加的常规配方奶粉。一组63名母乳喂养的婴儿作为参照组。在出生后第5天、第10天以及第4周、第8周、第12周和第16周采集粪便样本。与喂食Bb - 12和标准配方奶粉的组相比,GOS/FOS配方奶粉组在16周时粪便乙酸盐比例更高(分别为69.7%(标准误2.7)、69.9%(标准误3.9)和82.2%(标准误5.3);P<0.05),乳酸浓度更高(分别为11.3(标准误7.9)、3.1(标准误2.3)和34.7(标准误10.7)mmol/kg粪便),pH值更低(分别为6.6(标准误0.2)、7.1(标准误0.2)和5.6(标准误0.2);P<0.05)。在16周时,GOS/FOS组(59.2%(标准误7.7))、Bb - 12组(52.7%(标准误8.0))和标准组(51.8%(标准误6.4))之间双歧杆菌百分比差异无统计学意义。给婴儿喂食GOS/FOS配方奶粉对菌群代谢活性产生的影响与母乳喂养婴儿相似。在Bb - 12组中,菌群的组成和代谢活性与标准组更相似。