Pruneri Giancarlo, Valentini Stefano, Bertolini Francesco, Del Curto Barbara, Maiorano Eugenio, Viale Giuseppe
Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2005 Dec;13(4):318-22. doi: 10.1097/01.pai.0000137685.57687.1f.
Immunohistochemistry is the most widely used approach in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, its reliability may be hampered by several technical reasons, necessitating the use of alternative techniques such as the identification of the t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation to characterize such lesions. The authors compared two monoclonal antibodies (DCS-6 and SP4) for assessing cyclin D1 immunoreactivity in a series of 22 MCLs. Their results documented that SP4, a novel rabbit monoclonal antibody, is more effective than the mouse monoclonal antibody DCS-6, one of the most commonly used reagents in daily practice. Although DCS-6 and SP4 were capable of identifying cyclin D1 immunoreactivity in 95.4% and 100% of the cases analyzed, respectively, the prevalence of cyclin D1 immunoreactive neoplastic cells was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher with SP4 (86.6 +/- 13.1%) than with DCS-6 (39.8 +/- 32%). Moreover, the staining intensity was faint in 16 (76.2%) cases and moderate to strong in 5 (23.8%) cases immunostained with DCS- 6, while all the cases showed a moderate to strong immunoreactivity with SP4 (P < 0.0001). According to an arbitrary score based on the percentage of immunoreactive neoplastic cells and staining intensity, only 10 (45.4%) cases were considered high cyclin D1 expressors after staining with DCS-6, whereas all the cases were high expressors with SP4 (P < 0.0001). These data provide evidence that the SP4 monoclonal antibody may be a fast, easy-to-interpret, and reliable surrogate for the detection of the (11;14) translocation by molecular techniques.
免疫组织化学是套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)诊断中应用最广泛的方法。然而,其可靠性可能受到多种技术原因的影响,因此需要使用替代技术,如鉴定t(11;14)(q13;q32)易位来表征此类病变。作者比较了两种单克隆抗体(DCS-6和SP4)在一系列22例MCL中评估细胞周期蛋白D1免疫反应性的情况。他们的结果表明,SP4是一种新型兔单克隆抗体,比小鼠单克隆抗体DCS-6更有效,DCS-6是日常实践中最常用的试剂之一。尽管DCS-6和SP4分别能在95.4%和100%的分析病例中识别细胞周期蛋白D1免疫反应性,但SP4检测到的细胞周期蛋白D1免疫反应性肿瘤细胞的比例(86.6±13.1%)显著高于DCS-6(39.8±32%)(P<0.0001)。此外,用DCS-6免疫染色的16例(76.2%)病例染色强度较弱,5例(23.8%)病例染色强度为中度至强,而所有病例用SP4染色均显示中度至强免疫反应性(P<0.0001)。根据基于免疫反应性肿瘤细胞百分比和染色强度的任意评分,用DCS-6染色后只有10例(45.4%)病例被认为是细胞周期蛋白D1高表达者,而用SP4染色所有病例均为高表达者(P<0.0001)。这些数据表明,SP4单克隆抗体可能是一种快速、易于解读且可靠的替代方法,可用于通过分子技术检测(11;14)易位。