Lein Michael, Semjonow Axel, Graefen Markus, Kwiatkowski Maciej, Abramjuk Claudia, Stephan Carsten, Haese Alexander, Chun Felix, Schnorr Dietmar, Loening Stefan A, Jung Klaus
Departments of Urology, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10098 Berlin, Germany.
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2150-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181221.72017.ca.
The determination of pro prostate specific antigen (proPSA) forms has been suggested to be promising in prostate cancer diagnosis. In this multicenter trial we evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of (-5, -7) proPSA.
A total of 2,055 white men, including 1,046 with and 1,009 without prostate cancer, with total PSA (tPSA) between 0.28 and 81 ng/ml were retrospectively analyzed. Of these men 2,026 and 1,727 had tPSA less than 20 and less than 10 ng/ml, respectively. All subjects were untreated for prostatic disease and underwent multisector needle biopsy of the prostate. An Elecsys 2010 analyzer was used to determine tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and (-5, -7) proPSA in the 2,055 serum samples. ROC analyses were performed to discriminate men with biopsy positive and negative results in the entire and in select tPSA ranges.
In the select tPSA range 2 to 4 ng/ml the area under the ROC curve for proPSA (0.53) and proPSA/fPSA (0.59) was not significantly larger than that for tPSA (0.60) or the fPSA/tPSA (f/tPSA) ratio (0.64). In the tPSA range 4 to 10 ng/ml the area under the curve for the ratio proPSA/fPSA (0.67) was larger than for tPSA (0.53) but not larger than for f/tPSA (0.69). The f/tPSA ratio demonstrated the best discriminatory power in this tPSA range of 4 to 10 ng/ml.
In this multicenter study no improvement in diagnostic accuracy was shown when comparing (-5, -7) proPSA and the corresponding ratios with tPSA or f/tPSA. Further studies using other proPSA forms or tumor associated proteins should be done.
前列腺特异性抗原(proPSA)异构体的检测在前列腺癌诊断中颇具前景。在这项多中心试验中,我们评估了(-5,-7)proPSA的诊断效用。
对2055名白人男性进行回顾性分析,其中1046名患有前列腺癌,1009名未患前列腺癌,总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)在0.28至81 ng/ml之间。这些男性中,分别有2026名和1727名tPSA低于20 ng/ml和低于10 ng/ml。所有受试者均未接受过前列腺疾病治疗,并接受了前列腺多部位穿刺活检。使用Elecsys 2010分析仪测定2055份血清样本中的tPSA、游离前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA)和(-5,-7)proPSA。进行ROC分析以区分穿刺活检结果为阳性和阴性的男性,分析范围包括整个样本以及特定tPSA范围的样本。
在tPSA为2至4 ng/ml的特定范围内,proPSA(0.53)和proPSA/fPSA(0.59)的ROC曲线下面积并不显著大于tPSA(0.60)或fPSA/tPSA(f/tPSA)比值(0.64)的曲线下面积。在tPSA为4至10 ng/ml的范围内,proPSA/fPSA比值(0.67)的曲线下面积大于tPSA(0.53),但不大于f/tPSA(0.69)。在4至10 ng/ml的tPSA范围内,f/tPSA比值显示出最佳的鉴别能力。
在这项多中心研究中,将(-5,-7)proPSA及其相应比值与tPSA或f/tPSA进行比较时,未显示出诊断准确性的提高。应使用其他proPSA异构体或肿瘤相关蛋白进行进一步研究。