Suppr超能文献

确定哪些人接受抑郁症和焦虑症治疗:一项针对连续就诊全科医生患者的研究。

Deciding who gets treatment for depression and anxiety: a study of consecutive GP attenders.

作者信息

Hyde Julia, Evans Jonathan, Sharp Debbie, Croudace Tim, Harrison Glynn, Lewis Glyn, Araya Ricardo

机构信息

King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Health Psychology Section, Kings College London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Nov;55(520):846-53.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most research has focused on recognition by GPs of the common mental disorders: depression and anxiety. However, less is known about the factors that determine whether patients with those disorders that are recognised receive any active treatment.

AIM

To investigate factors associated with receiving active treatment among consecutive attenders identified by GPs as having a common mental disorder.

SETTING

Data were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial in 30 general practices in the south of Bristol, UK, on the impact of mental health guidelines in primary care.

METHOD

We studied 439 consecutive general practice attenders aged 16-64 years who were given a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or chronic mixed anxiety and depression by their GP. The main outcome measure was the provision of any active treatment, whether pharmacological or psychological, for these disorders. Patient, GP, and practice level data, including sociodemographic, clinical, and administrative data were explored as predictors in a logistic regression model. Huber White variance estimates were used to account for hierarchical clustering.

RESULTS

Of those patients identified as having a common mental disorder by the GP, 54% were offered active treatment. Higher symptom score, as measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.13; P<0.001) and being male (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.09; P = 0.006), were both associated with an increased likelihood of being offered active treatment. Patients with anxiety (OR = 0.24; 95% = CI 0.14 to 0.41; P<0.001), or chronic mixed anxiety/depression (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.003) were less likely to be offered active treatment than those considered to have depression.

CONCLUSION

When deciding to offer active treatment for common mental disorders, GPs appear to be influenced by the severity of symptoms rather than their 'understandability' in relation to recent life stresses or the social context of distress. Further research is needed to investigate why men are more likely and those with an anxiety disorder less likely, to be offered active treatment.

摘要

背景

大多数研究都聚焦于全科医生对常见精神障碍(抑郁症和焦虑症)的识别。然而,对于那些被识别出患有这些疾病的患者是否接受任何积极治疗的决定因素,我们了解得较少。

目的

调查在被全科医生识别为患有常见精神障碍的连续就诊者中,与接受积极治疗相关的因素。

背景

数据收集是作为一项群组随机对照试验的一部分,该试验在英国布里斯托尔南部的30家全科诊所进行,旨在研究初级保健中精神健康指南的影响。

方法

我们研究了439名年龄在16 - 64岁之间的连续就诊的全科患者,他们被全科医生诊断为患有抑郁症、焦虑症或慢性混合性焦虑和抑郁症。主要结局指标是针对这些疾病提供任何积极治疗,无论是药物治疗还是心理治疗。患者、全科医生和诊所层面的数据,包括社会人口统计学、临床和管理数据,都作为逻辑回归模型中的预测因素进行了探讨。使用稳健标准误(Huber White方差估计)来考虑分层聚类。

结果

在被全科医生识别为患有常见精神障碍的患者中,54%接受了积极治疗。用一般健康问卷(GHQ)测量的较高症状评分(比值比[OR]=1.09;95%置信区间[CI]=1.06至1.13;P<0.001)和男性(OR = 1.54;95% CI = 1.13至2.09;P = 0.006),都与接受积极治疗的可能性增加相关。患有焦虑症(OR = 0.24;95% = CI 0.14至0.41;P<0.001)或慢性混合性焦虑/抑郁症(OR = 0.41;95% CI = 0.23至0.73;P = 0.003)的患者,比被认为患有抑郁症的患者接受积极治疗的可能性更小。

结论

在决定对常见精神障碍提供积极治疗时,全科医生似乎受症状严重程度的影响,而非与近期生活压力或痛苦的社会背景相关的“可理解性”。需要进一步研究来调查为什么男性更有可能,而患有焦虑症的患者更不可能接受积极治疗。

相似文献

6
Depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study.
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Sep;67(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
8
[Appropriate care for anxiety and depression].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2360.
9
Delivering stepped care for depression in general practice: results of a survey amongst general practitioners in the Netherlands.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;19(4):221-9. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.780018. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of depression in the first primary care consultation: A qualitative study.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jun;11(6):2597-2602. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1904_21. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Mental health care as delivered by Dutch general practitioners between 2004 and 2008.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Sep;30(3):156-62. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.688707. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

3
Sociological influences on antidepressant prescribing.
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(6):1335-44. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00132-6.
5
Managing depression in primary care: another example of the inverse care law?
Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;19(6):632-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.6.632.
8
Who is at risk of nondetection of mental health problems in primary care?
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jun;15(6):381-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.12088.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验