Ahmed Ali
Geriatric Heart Failure Clinic, and Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Oct;60(10):1339-44. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.10.1339.
Studies of patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function report variable outcomes compared with those of patients with impaired systolic function.
To study outcomes of diastolic (vs systolic) heart failure in older adults with chronic heart failure.
Patients were ambulatory chronic heart failure patients 65 years and older (N = 3984) who participated in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Of these, 3405 had systolic heart failure (ejection fraction < or =45%) and 579 had diastolic heart failure (ejection fraction >45%). By using a 1:1 match by age, sex, and race, 571 diastolic heart failure patients were matched with 571 systolic heart failure patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to estimate the risk of various outcomes between the groups.
During the 1044 mean days of follow up, compared with 41% of systolic heart failure patients, 27% of diastolic heart failure patients died (p <.001). Presence of diastolic heart failure was independently associated with a 27% decreased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.91) and a 32% reduction in risk of hospitalization due to heart failure (adjusted HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.88). There was no difference in overall hospitalization between the groups. However, compared with systolic heart failure patients, diastolic heart failure patients were more likely to be hospitalized due to noncardiovascular causes (adjusted HR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02-1.88).
Older adults with diastolic heart failure had lower risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations, but higher risk of noncardiovascular hospitalization.
与收缩功能受损的患者相比,对收缩功能保留的心力衰竭患者的研究报告的结果存在差异。
研究老年慢性心力衰竭患者舒张性(与收缩性)心力衰竭的结局。
患者为65岁及以上的非卧床慢性心力衰竭患者(N = 3984),他们参与了洋地黄研究组试验。其中,3405例患有收缩性心力衰竭(射血分数≤45%),579例患有舒张性心力衰竭(射血分数>45%)。通过按年龄、性别和种族进行1:1匹配,571例舒张性心力衰竭患者与571例收缩性心力衰竭患者进行了匹配。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和多变量Cox比例风险分析来估计两组之间各种结局的风险。
在平均1044天的随访期间,与41%的收缩性心力衰竭患者相比,27%的舒张性心力衰竭患者死亡(p<.001)。舒张性心力衰竭的存在与全因死亡风险降低27%(调整后的风险比[HR]=0.73;95%置信区间[CI],0.58 - 0.91)以及因心力衰竭住院风险降低32%(调整后的HR = 0.68;95% CI,0.52 - 0.88)独立相关。两组之间的总体住院率没有差异。然而,与收缩性心力衰竭患者相比,舒张性心力衰竭患者因非心血管原因住院的可能性更大(调整后的HR = 1.38;95% CI,1.02 - 1.88)。
患有舒张性心力衰竭的老年人全因死亡率和与心力衰竭相关的住院风险较低,但非心血管住院风险较高。