• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期稳定和不稳定正畸治疗结果的回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes.

作者信息

Ormiston Jonathan Perry, Huang Greg J, Little Robert M, Decker Jay D, Seuk Geoffrey D

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7446, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):568-74; quiz 669. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.047.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.047
PMID:16286203
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare groups of patients with the most stable and the most unstable treatment results as rated by the peer assessment rating (PAR) index to identify factors associated with stability. All factors with significant crude odds ratios were investigated to create a multiple logistic regression model that could be used to predict stability.

METHODS

The sample of 86 patients (30 male, 56 female), from the post-retention archives at the University of Washington, was not restricted to specific malocclusion types or treatment modalities with the exception of Angle Class III patients, who were excluded. The sample was divided into 2 groups, stable (n = 45) and unstable (n = 41), based on post-retention unweighted PAR scores and PAR score changes between posttreatment and post-retention. Model and radiographic measurements were made before treatment, after treatment, and after retention (average 14.4 years).

RESULTS

The results showed that male sex and a sustained period of growth were related, and both were associated with increased instability. The initial severity of malocclusion, as graded by the PAR index and the irregularity index, was negatively correlated with post-retention stability-ie, patients with more severe index scores before treatment tended to be less stable. Differences in American Board of Orthodontics scores after treatment were diminished after retention.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors associated with predicting stability were pretreatment arch length, pretreatment PAR score, molar classification, and sex.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较根据同行评估评级(PAR)指数评定的治疗结果最稳定和最不稳定的患者组,以确定与稳定性相关的因素。对所有具有显著粗比值比的因素进行研究,以建立一个可用于预测稳定性的多元逻辑回归模型。

方法

从华盛顿大学的保留后档案中选取86例患者(30例男性,56例女性)作为样本,除安氏III类患者被排除外,样本不受特定错牙合类型或治疗方式的限制。根据保留后未加权的PAR评分以及治疗后与保留后的PAR评分变化,将样本分为两组,稳定组(n = 45)和不稳定组(n = 41)。在治疗前、治疗后和保留后(平均14.4年)进行模型和影像学测量。

结果

结果显示,男性性别与持续生长阶段相关,且两者均与不稳定增加有关。由PAR指数和不规则指数分级的错牙合初始严重程度与保留后稳定性呈负相关,即治疗前指数评分越高的患者往往越不稳定。治疗后美国正畸委员会评分的差异在保留后减小。

结论

与预测稳定性相关的因素有治疗前牙弓长度、治疗前PAR评分、磨牙分类和性别。

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes.长期稳定和不稳定正畸治疗结果的回顾性分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):568-74; quiz 669. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.047.
2
Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.最终咬合质量对保持后咬合复发的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):428.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.051.
3
Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.亚洲男性错颌畸形严重程度与错颌畸形类型及正畸治疗需求的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.045.
4
Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion.早期治疗对安氏II类错牙合患者咬合稳定性的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Feb;133(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.038.
5
Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.使用PAR指数评估前牵引面罩治疗的治疗效果及治疗后变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Oct;118(4):414-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.108253.
6
Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment out of retention.正畸治疗结束后长期稳定性
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002 May;37(3):216-8.
7
Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.由美国正畸委员会客观评分系统测量的长期治疗后变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):444-50; quiz 516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.029.
8
Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.上颌前磨牙拔除和不拔牙矫治方案中的二类错矫治效率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.031.
9
Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.II类错牙合畸形1期和2期治疗方案的同伴评估评分(PAR)比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):489-96. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540603000453.
10
Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability. Part I: Pretreatment vertical pattern and stability.垂直面部形态与正畸稳定性。第一部分:治疗前垂直形态与稳定性。
Aust Orthod J. 2000 Nov;16(3):127-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Striving for Perfection: How Stable Is Orthodontic Treatment When Excellent Outcomes Are Achieved? A 9-Year Post-Treatment Retrospective Study.追求完美:正畸治疗达到卓越效果后有多稳定?一项9年的治疗后回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 14;12(24):7692. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247692.
2
Cephalometric comparison of mandibular growth in Brazilian children with Class II malocclusion and normal occlusion during the growth stages determined by the cervical vertebrae maturation.颈椎成熟度确定的生长阶段中,巴西骨性 II 类错颌与正常颌儿童下颌生长的头影测量比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Nov 3;28(5):e232358. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.5.e232358.oar. eCollection 2023.
3
The development of a novel Orthodontic Alignment Index and its use to evaluate the effect of residual overjet on the stability of the alignment of the maxillary anterior dentition.
一种新型正畸排齐指数的发展及其用于评估剩余覆𬌗对上颌前牙排齐稳定性的影响。
Prog Orthod. 2022 Dec 28;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00444-1.
4
Validity and Reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating Index Scored on Digital Models Using a Software Compared with Traditional Manual Scoring.与传统手动评分相比,使用软件对数字模型进行评分的同行评估评级指数的有效性和可重复性。
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 13;10(8):1646. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081646.
5
Retention Protocols and Factors Affecting Retainer Choice among Iraqi Orthodontists.伊拉克正畸医生的保持方案及影响保持器选择的因素
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 23;2020:8810641. doi: 10.1155/2020/8810641. eCollection 2020.
6
Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.骨性 II 类 1 分类错(牙合)的拔牙矫治:PAR 指数评价治疗及治疗后变化。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12412. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Survey on Retention Protocols Among Turkish Orthodontists.土耳其正畸医生保留方案调查
Turk J Orthod. 2016 Sep;29(3):51-58. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.06. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Digital Dynamic 3D Monitoring of Lower Incisors Intrusion in Lingual Orthodontics.舌侧正畸中下切牙内收的数字动态三维监测
Open Dent J. 2018 Jan 31;12:104-117. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010104. eCollection 2018.
9
Clinical Evaluation of Bond Failures and Survival of Mandibular Canine-to-canine Bonded Retainers during a 12-year Time Span.12年期间下颌尖牙间粘结保持器粘结失败及存留情况的临床评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Oct-Dec;10(4):330-334. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1460. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Post-treatment changes in permanent retention.治疗后永久性固位的变化。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Nov;77(6):446-453. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0054-0. Epub 2016 Oct 19.