• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨性 II 类 1 分类错(牙合)的拔牙矫治:PAR 指数评价治疗及治疗后变化。

Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.

机构信息

Private practice, Gorinchem, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12412. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12412
PMID:32725964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891627/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate occlusal result and post-treatment changes after orthodontic extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion.

SETTING AND SAMPLE

Retrospective longitudinal study in a private practice, with outcome evaluation by an independent academic hospital. Ninety-six patients (53 males, 43 females) consecutively treated by one orthodontist with maxillary first permanent molar extraction were studied, divided into three facial types, based on pre-treatment cephalometric values: hypodivergent (n = 18), normodivergent (n = 21) and hyperdivergent (n = 57).

METHODS

Occlusal outcome was scored on dental casts at T1 (pre-treatment), T2 (post-treatment) and T3 (mean follow-up 2.5 ± 0.9 years) using the weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The paired sample t test and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

PAR was reduced by 95.7% and 89.9% at T2 and T3, respectively, compared with the start of treatment. The largest post-treatment changes were found for overjet and buccal occlusion. Linear regression analysis did not reveal a clear effect (R-Square 0.074) of age, sex, PAR score at T1, incremental PAR score T2-T1, overjet and overbite at T1, and facial type on the changes after treatment (incremental PAR score T3-T2).

CONCLUSIONS

The occlusal outcome achieved after Class II division 1 treatment with maxillary first permanent molar extractions was maintained to a large extent over a mean post-treatment follow-up of 2.5 years. Limited changes after treatment were found, for which no risk factors could be discerned.

摘要

目的

研究安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合患者上颌第一恒磨牙拔牙矫治后的咬合结果和治疗后变化。

设置和样本

一项在私人诊所进行的回顾性纵向研究,由一家学术性附属医院进行独立的结果评估。研究了一位正畸医生连续治疗的 96 名患者(53 名男性,43 名女性),根据治疗前的头影测量值将患者分为三类面型:低角型(n=18)、均角型(n=21)和高角型(n=57)。

方法

在 T1(治疗前)、T2(治疗后)和 T3(平均随访 2.5±0.9 年)时,使用加权 Peer Assessment Rating(PAR)指数对牙模的咬合结果进行评分。采用配对样本 t 检验和单因素方差分析,然后采用 Tukey 事后检验进行统计学分析。

结果

与治疗开始时相比,T2 和 T3 时的 PAR 分别减少了 95.7%和 89.9%。治疗后变化最大的是覆盖和颊侧咬合。线性回归分析未发现年龄、性别、T1 时的 PAR 评分、T2-T1 时的增量 PAR 评分、T1 时的覆盖和覆牙合、面型对治疗后变化(T3-T2 时的增量 PAR 评分)有明显影响(R-Square 0.074)。

结论

上颌第一恒磨牙拔牙矫治安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合后,在平均 2.5 年的治疗后随访中,咬合结果在很大程度上得到了维持。治疗后变化有限,未能发现任何危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/62b70e0cd248/OCR-24-102-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/31412a8bd844/OCR-24-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/fac6a619bac3/OCR-24-102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/62b70e0cd248/OCR-24-102-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/31412a8bd844/OCR-24-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/fac6a619bac3/OCR-24-102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cc/7891627/62b70e0cd248/OCR-24-102-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.骨性 II 类 1 分类错(牙合)的拔牙矫治:PAR 指数评价治疗及治疗后变化。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12412. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形患者上颌第一恒磨牙的拔除
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.034.
3
Treatment outcome of class II malocclusion therapy including extraction of maxillary first molars: a cephalometric comparison between normodivergent and hyperdivergent facial types.上颌第一磨牙拔除的安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)矫治的治疗效果:正常生长型与高角型颅面结构的头影测量比较。
PeerJ. 2022 Dec 12;10:e14537. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14537. eCollection 2022.
4
Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.拔除上颌第一磨牙可改善安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错牙合中第二、第三磨牙的倾斜度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.026.
5
Maxillary sinus floor extension and posterior tooth inclination in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first molar extractions.上颌窦底提升术和后牙倾斜在安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)青少年患者中治疗上颌第一磨牙拔牙的应用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):479-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.024.
6
Cephalometric and occlusal changes of Class III malocclusion treated with or without extractions.伴或不伴拔牙矫治的安氏III类错牙合的头影测量及咬合变化
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Jul-Aug;25(4):24-32. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.024-032.oar.
7
Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.使用PAR指数评估治疗及治疗后的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279.
8
Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.重度安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形的治疗:一例病例报告。
Aust Orthod J. 2011 Nov;27(2):181-90.
9
Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.拔除3颗和4颗前磨牙治疗安氏II类亚类错牙合的稳定性
Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 30;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4.
10
Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.Herbst 疗法的 32 年随访研究:一项生物计量牙模分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.012.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy of the RME II System Compared with the Sander Bite-Jumping Appliance: A Retrospective Study.RME II系统与桑德咬合跳跃矫治器疗效的对比:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 May 25;14(11):3700. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113700.
2
Second Versus First Molar Extractions in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Outcome Study into Maxillary Canine, Premolar, and Molar Movement.安氏II类1分类错牙合治疗中拔除第二磨牙与第一磨牙的比较:一项关于上颌尖牙、前磨牙和磨牙移动的回顾性纵向结果研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 3;14(1):225. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010225.
3
Treatment outcome of class II malocclusion therapy including extraction of maxillary first molars: a cephalometric comparison between normodivergent and hyperdivergent facial types.

本文引用的文献

1
Publication pattern, study design, authors and countries involved in orthodontic RCTs - a bibliometric MEDLINE survey over the past 50 years.正畸随机对照试验的发表模式、研究设计、作者及涉及国家——过去50年的文献计量学MEDLINE调查
J Orthod. 2019 Jun;46(2):110-117. doi: 10.1177/1465312519840045. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Mandibular incisor alignment in untreated subjects compared with long-term changes after orthodontic treatment with or without retainers.未治疗患者与正畸治疗后(无论是否佩戴保持器)的长期变化相比,下颌切牙的排列。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Feb;155(2):234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.025.
3
上颌第一磨牙拔除的安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)矫治的治疗效果:正常生长型与高角型颅面结构的头影测量比较。
PeerJ. 2022 Dec 12;10:e14537. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14537. eCollection 2022.
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.
儿童和青少年上前牙突出(安氏II类错牙合)的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
4
Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.拔牙与不拔牙正畸固定矫治器治疗后的软组织变化:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2018 Jun;126(3):167-179. doi: 10.1111/eos.12409. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Interpreting weightings of the peer assessment rating index and the discrepancy index across contexts on Chinese patients.解读同行评估评级指数的权重以及中国患者不同背景下的差异指数。
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):157-163. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx043.
6
Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: An 8-year follow-up.正畸治疗结果与保持状态的相关性:8年随访
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jun;151(6):1027-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.032.
7
Effectiveness of early orthopaedic treatment with headgear: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头帽早期正畸治疗的有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Apr 1;39(2):176-187. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw041.
8
Another way of looking at treatment stability.看待治疗稳定性的另一种方式。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):721-6. doi: 10.2319/101515-697.1. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review.拔牙治疗的安氏II类错颌患者的软组织变化:一项系统评价
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Dec;38(6):631-637. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv083. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
10
Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.II类固定功能矫治器治疗的稳定性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):129-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009. Epub 2015 Mar 28.