• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards.

作者信息

Richmond S, Shaw W C, Roberts C T, Andrews M

机构信息

Department of Oral Health and Development, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 1992 Jun;14(3):180-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/14.3.180.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/14.3.180
PMID:1628684
Abstract

In orthodontics it is important to objectively assess whether a worthwhile improvement has been achieved in terms of overall alignment and occlusion for an individual patient or the greater proportion of a practitioner's caseload. An objective measure is described that has been validated against the subjective opinions of 74 dentists. Using the weighted PAR Index it was revealed that at least a 30 per cent reduction in PAR score is required for a case to be considered as 'improved' and a change of 22 PAR points to bring about 'great improvement'. For a practitioner to demonstrate high standards the proportion of an individual's case load falling in the 'worse or no different' category should be negligible and the mean reduction should be as high as possible (e.g. greater than 70 per cent). If the mean percentage reduction in PAR score is high and the proportion of cases that have been 'greatly improved' is also high, this indicates that the practitioner is treating a great proportion of cases with a clear need for treatment to a high standard.

摘要

相似文献

1
The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards.
Eur J Orthod. 1992 Jun;14(3):180-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/14.3.180.
2
Orthodontic treatment--improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index.正畸治疗——使用同行评估评级指数的改进与标准
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):260-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0260:OTASUT]2.0.CO;2.
3
Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland.苏格兰普通牙科服务中使用固定矫治器的正畸治疗。
J Orthod. 2000 Jun;27(2):175-80. doi: 10.1093/ortho/27.2.175.
4
Personal audit in orthodontics.正畸学中的个人审核
Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):135-44. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.135.
5
[Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].[根据同伴评估评分指数评估正畸治疗的疗效]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:335-51.
6
Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.使用PAR指数评估治疗及治疗后的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279.
7
A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.使用客观评分系统(OGS)和同行评估评分(PAR)指数对正畸治疗结果进行的比较。
Aust Orthod J. 2015 Nov;31(2):157-64.
8
The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.错颌畸形严重程度和治疗难度的同伴评估评分指数的验证
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Feb;107(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70133-8.
9
The PAR index for evaluation of treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a clinical audit of 50 cases.用于评估正畸治疗结果的PAR指数:50例临床审计
Int Orthod. 2014 Mar;12(1):84-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
10
An investigation into the standard of orthodontic treatment carried out by GDPs after completion of a clinical assistant training.对完成临床助理培训后的全科牙医进行的正畸治疗标准的一项调查。
Br Dent J. 1996 Feb 10;180(3):91-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808987.

引用本文的文献

1
Distalization with Clear Aligners: Accuracy, Impact of Mini-Screws, and Clinical Outcomes.使用透明矫治器进行远中移动:准确性、微螺钉的影响及临床结果。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;13(7):316. doi: 10.3390/dj13070316.
2
Association between subjective orthodontic treatment need, oral health-related quality of life, and occlusal deviations in a cohort of 17-year-old adolescents in Finland.芬兰一组17岁青少年的主观正畸治疗需求、口腔健康相关生活质量与咬合偏差之间的关联。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 May 13;84:232-240. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43565.
3
Occlusal changes during orthognathic therapy using a completely customised lingual appliance - initial retrospective observations.
使用完全定制舌侧矫治器进行正颌治疗期间的咬合变化——初步回顾性观察
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 25;29(5):272. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06347-9.
4
Application of a 3D Fusion Model to Evaluate the Efficacy of Clear Aligner Therapy in Malocclusion Patients: Prospective Observational Study.应用三维融合模型评估正畸治疗对牙列不齐患者的疗效:前瞻性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e67378. doi: 10.2196/67378.
5
The influence of orthodontist change on treatment duration and outcomes in patients treated with Clark's twin block appliance followed by non-extraction fixed mechanotherapy - a retrospective cohort study.正畸医生更换对采用克拉克双阻板矫治器治疗后非拔牙固定机械疗法患者的治疗疗程及疗效的影响——一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1521. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05351-x.
6
Early orthodontic treatment need over a 10-year period and evaluation of short-term intervention stability.早期正畸治疗需要超过10年的时间,并对短期干预稳定性进行评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 13;29(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06104-4.
7
Occlusal and Cephalometric Outcomes of Cleft Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.腭裂正颌术后的咬合与头影测量学结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Dec;10(6):e70019. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70019.
8
Orthodontic treatment protocol versus Peer Assessment Rating: Assessing the quality of orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗方案与同行评估评分:评估正畸治疗质量
J Orthod. 2025 Mar;52(1):45-55. doi: 10.1177/14653125241268763. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
9
Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in a German convenience sample : Part 2: Cross-sectional patient-reported outcomes after orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗质量——一项针对德国便利样本的多中心队列研究:第2部分:正畸治疗后患者报告的横断面结局
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00528-z.
10
Validity and reliability of the orthodontic experience questionnaire in Malayalam, an Indian language.马拉雅拉姆语(一种印度语言)正畸体验问卷的效度和信度
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:48. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_5_23. eCollection 2023.