Heine Steven J
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):531-8. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.531.
C. Sedikides, L. Gaertner, and Y. Toguchi (2003) maintained that the self-enhancement motivation (as defined by tendencies to view oneself in overly positive terms) is universal. The present article challenges their claim. A review of the literature revealed that many studies contradict their findings regarding the domain-specific nature of East Asian self-enhancement. It is argued that Sedikides et al. did not replicate past research because they did not measure self-enhancement in their studies. The present article provides a theoretical basis for understanding cross-cultural differences in self-enhancement and considers the question of universality by exploring 2 different conceptualizations of positive self-regard.
C. 塞迪基德斯、L. 盖特纳和Y. 户口(2003年)认为自我提升动机(定义为倾向于以过度积极的方式看待自己)是普遍存在的。本文对他们的观点提出质疑。对文献的回顾表明,许多研究与他们关于东亚自我提升的领域特定性的研究结果相矛盾。有人认为,塞迪基德斯等人没有重复过去的研究,因为他们在研究中没有测量自我提升。本文为理解自我提升中的跨文化差异提供了理论基础,并通过探索两种不同的积极自我关注概念来考虑普遍性问题。