Del Prado Alicia M, Church A Timothy, Katigbak Marcia S, Miramontes Lilia G, Whitty Monica, Curtis Guy J, de Jesús Vargas-Flores José, Ibáñez-Reyes Joselina, Ortiz Fernando A, Reyes Jose Alberto S
Washington State University.
J Res Pers. 2007 Dec;41(6):1119-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.002.
Three theoretical perspectives on cultural universals and differences in the content of self-concepts were tested in individualistic (United States, n = 178; Australia, n = 112) and collectivistic (Mexico, n = 157; Philippines, n = 138) cultures, using three methods of self-concept assessment. Support was found for both trait perspectives and the individual-self-primacy hypothesis. In contrast, support for cultural psychology hypotheses was limited because traits and other personal attributes were not more salient, or social attributes less salient, in individualistic cultures than collectivistic cultures. The salience of some aspects of self-concept depended on the method of assessment, calling into question conclusions based on monomethod studies.
运用三种自我概念评估方法，在个人主义文化（美国，n = 178；澳大利亚，n = 112）和集体主义文化（墨西哥，n = 157；菲律宾，n = 138）中，对关于文化普遍性以及自我概念内容差异的三种理论观点进行了检验。特质观点和个人自我首要性假设均得到了支持。相比之下，对文化心理学假设的支持有限，因为在个人主义文化中，特质及其他个人属性并不比集体主义文化中更显著，社会属性也不比集体主义文化中更不显著。自我概念某些方面的显著性取决于评估方法，这使得基于单一方法研究得出的结论受到质疑。
