Wilson Ira B, Landon Bruce E, Hirschhorn Lisa R, McInnes Keith, Ding Lin, Marsden Peter V, Cleary Paul D
Tufts-New England Medical Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Nov 15;143(10):729-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-00010.
Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are primary care providers for patients with HIV in some clinics, but little is known about the quality of care that they provide.
To compare the quality of care provided by NPs and PAs with that provided by physicians.
Cross-sectional analysis.
68 HIV care sites, funded by Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency (CARE) Act Title III, in 30 different states.
The authors surveyed 243 clinicians (177 physicians and 66 NPs and PAs) and reviewed medical records of 6651 persons with HIV or AIDS.
8 quality-of-care measures assessed by medical record review.
After adjustments for patient characteristics, 6 of the 8 quality measures did not statistically significantly differ between NPs and PAs and either infectious disease specialists or generalist HIV experts. Adjusted rates of purified protein derivative testing and Papanicolaou smears were statistically significantly higher for NPs and PAs (0.63 and 0.71, respectively) than for infectious disease specialists (0.53 [P = 0.007] and 0.56 [P = 0.001], respectively) or generalist HIV experts (0.47 [P < 0.001] and 0.62 [P = 0.025], respectively). Nurse practitioners and PAs had statistically significantly higher performance scores than generalist non-HIV experts on 6 of the 8 quality measures.
These results may not be generalizable to care settings where on-site physician HIV experts are not accessible or to measures of more complex clinical processes.
For the measures examined, the quality of HIV care provided by NPs and PAs was similar to that of physician HIV experts and generally better than physician non-HIV experts. Nurse practitioners and PAs can provide high-quality care for persons with HIV. Preconditions for this level of performance include high levels of experience, focus on a single condition, and either participation in teams or other easy access to physicians and other clinicians with HIV expertise.
在一些诊所中,执业护士(NPs)和医师助理(PAs)是艾滋病毒患者的初级保健提供者,但对于他们所提供的护理质量了解甚少。
比较执业护士和医师助理与医生所提供的护理质量。
横断面分析。
由瑞安·怀特综合艾滋病资源紧急情况(CARE)法案第三章资助的68个艾滋病毒护理点,分布在30个不同的州。
作者调查了243名临床医生(177名医生以及66名执业护士和医师助理),并查阅了6651名艾滋病毒或艾滋病患者的病历。
通过病历审查评估8项护理质量指标。
在对患者特征进行调整后,8项质量指标中的6项在执业护士和医师助理与传染病专家或普通艾滋病毒专家之间无统计学显著差异。执业护士和医师助理的纯化蛋白衍生物检测和巴氏涂片检查的调整率在统计学上显著高于传染病专家(分别为0.63和0.71)(分别为0.53 [P = 0.007]和0.56 [P = 0.001])或普通艾滋病毒专家(分别为0.47 [P < 0.001]和0.62 [P = 0.025])。在8项质量指标中的6项上,执业护士和医师助理的表现得分在统计学上显著高于普通非艾滋病毒专家。
这些结果可能不适用于无法获得现场医生艾滋病毒专家的护理环境,也不适用于更复杂临床过程的指标。
对于所检查的指标,执业护士和医师助理所提供的艾滋病毒护理质量与医生艾滋病毒专家相似,并且总体上优于非艾滋病毒医生专家。执业护士和医师助理可以为艾滋病毒患者提供高质量护理。达到这种表现水平的前提条件包括高水平的经验、专注于单一病症以及参与团队或其他方便接触具有艾滋病毒专业知识的医生和其他临床医生。