Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; and.
Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2024 Jun 1;96(2):180-189. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003410.
We compared HIV care outcomes by HIV provider type to inform efforts to strengthen the HIV provider workforce.
United States.
We analyzed data from Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Medical Monitoring Project collected during June, 2019-May, 2021 from 6323 adults receiving HIV medical care. Provider types include infectious disease physicians only (ID physicians), non-ID physicians only, nurse practitioners only, physician assistants only, and ID physicians plus nurse practitioners and/or physician assistants (mixed providers). We measured patient characteristics, social determinants of health, and clinical outcomes, including retention in care; antiretroviral therapy prescription; antiretroviral therapy adherence; viral suppression; gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis testing; satisfaction with HIV care; and HIV provider trust.
Compared with patients of ID physicians, higher percentages of patients of other provider types had characteristics and social determinants of health associated with poor health outcomes and received HIV care at Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program-funded facilities. After accounting for these differences, most outcomes were not meaningfully different; however, higher percentages of patients of non-ID physicians, nurse practitioners, and mixed providers were retained in care (6.5, 5.6, and 12.7 percentage points, respectively) and had sexually transmitted infection testing in the past 12 months, if sexually active (6.9, 7.4, and 13.5 percentage points, respectively).
Most HIV outcomes were equivalent across provider types. However, patients of non-ID physicians, nurse practitioners, and mixed providers were more likely to be retained in care and have recommended sexually transmitted infection testing. Increasing delivery of comprehensive primary care by ID physicians and including primary care providers in ID practices could improve HIV primary care outcomes.
我们比较了不同类型的 HIV 提供者的 HIV 护理结果,以努力加强 HIV 提供者队伍。
美国。
我们分析了美国疾病控制与预防中心的医疗监测项目在 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 5 月期间收集的 6323 名接受 HIV 医疗护理的成年人的数据。提供者类型包括仅传染病医生(ID 医生)、仅非 ID 医生、仅护士从业者、仅医师助理,以及 ID 医生加护士从业者和/或医师助理(混合提供者)。我们测量了患者特征、健康的社会决定因素以及临床结果,包括保持在护理中;抗逆转录病毒疗法的处方;抗逆转录病毒疗法的依从性;病毒抑制;淋病、衣原体和梅毒检测;对 HIV 护理的满意度;以及对 HIV 提供者的信任。
与 ID 医生的患者相比,其他类型提供者的患者具有与健康结果不良相关的特征和健康的社会决定因素,并且在 Ryan White HIV/AIDS 计划资助的设施中接受 HIV 护理。在考虑到这些差异后,大多数结果没有明显差异;然而,更高比例的非 ID 医生、护士从业者和混合提供者保持在护理中(分别为 6.5%、5.6%和 12.7%),并且如果有性行为,则在过去 12 个月内进行了性传播感染检测(分别为 6.9%、7.4%和 13.5%)。
大多数 HIV 结果在提供者类型之间是相等的。然而,非 ID 医生、护士从业者和混合提供者的患者更有可能保持在护理中,并接受推荐的性传播感染检测。增加 ID 医生提供全面的初级保健,并将初级保健提供者纳入 ID 实践,可以改善 HIV 初级保健结果。