Schulze Alexander, Mons Ute, Edler Lutz, Pötschke-Langer Martina
German Cancer Research Center, Executive Office Cancer Prevention, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Prev Med. 2006 Jan;42(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Nov 11.
This study examines the effectiveness of the school-based campaign "Smoke-Free Class Competition" as a means of preventing young non-smokers from taking up smoking.
Based on two measurements of the Heidelberg Children's Panel Study (1998 and 2000), a longitudinal sample of 1704 pupils was examined: 948 in the intervention group and 756 in the control group. In order to evaluate the effects of the intervention, we compared the smoking behavior in the intervention and the control group at two points in time, shortly before, and 18 months after the intervention, on an individual case basis.
(1) Stabilization of never-smoking rates: the proportion of pupils remaining a never-smoker at the follow-up is 62.1% in the intervention group and 61.5% in the control group (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83-1.24); (2) Lowering of relapse rates among ex-smokers: the proportion of former smokers who had not started smoking again in the follow-up is 45.1% in the intervention group and 41.4% in the control group (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.77-1.49).
The "Smoke-Free Class Competition" did not prevent smoking among adolescents and does not appear to be an effective substitute to the complete ban of tobacco advertising, the abolition of vending machines and the creation of smoke-free environments in German schools.
本研究考察了以学校为基础的“无烟班级竞赛”活动作为预防青少年非吸烟者开始吸烟的一种手段的有效性。
基于海德堡儿童小组研究的两次测量(1998年和2000年),对1704名学生的纵向样本进行了考察:干预组948名,对照组756名。为了评估干预效果,我们在个体层面上比较了干预组和对照组在干预前及干预后18个月这两个时间点的吸烟行为。
(1)从不吸烟率稳定:随访时干预组中仍为从不吸烟者的比例为62.1%,对照组为61.5%(比值比1.02,95%置信区间:0.83 - 1.24);(2)前吸烟者复吸率降低:随访时干预组中未再次开始吸烟的前吸烟者比例为45.1%,对照组为41.4%(比值比1.07,95%置信区间:0.77 - 1.49)。
“无烟班级竞赛”未能预防青少年吸烟,在德国学校中,它似乎并非全面禁止烟草广告、取消自动售货机以及营造无烟环境的有效替代措施。