Gonçalves S I, de Munck J C, Pouwels P J W, Schoonhoven R, Kuijer J P A, Maurits N M, Hoogduin J M, Van Someren E J W, Heethaar R M, Lopes da Silva F H
VU University Medical Centre (Dpt. PMT), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Neuroimage. 2006 Mar;30(1):203-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.062. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
Simultaneous recording of electroencephalogram/functional magnetic resonance images (EEG/fMRI) was applied to identify blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) changes associated with spontaneous variations of the alpha rhythm, which is considered the hallmark of the brain resting state. The analysis was focused on inter-subject variability associated with the resting state. Data from 7 normal subjects are presented. Confirming earlier findings, three subjects showed a negative correlation between the BOLD signal and the average power time series within the alpha band (8--12 Hz) in extensive areas of the occipital, parietal and frontal lobes. In small thalamic areas, the BOLD signal was positively correlated with the alpha power. For subjects 3 and 4, who displayed two different states during the data acquisition time, it was shown that the corresponding correlation patterns were different, thus demonstrating the state dependency of the results. In subject 5, the changes in BOLD were observed mainly in the frontal and temporal lobes. Subject 6 only showed positive correlations, thus contradicting the negative BOLD alpha power cortical correlations that were found in most subjects. Results suggest that the resting state varies over subjects and, sometimes, even within one subject. As the resting state plays an important role in many fMRI experiments, the inter-subject variability of this state should be addressed when comparing fMRI results from different subjects.
同时记录脑电图/功能磁共振成像(EEG/fMRI),以识别与α节律的自发变化相关的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)变化,α节律被认为是大脑静息状态的标志。分析聚焦于与静息状态相关的个体间变异性。展示了来自7名正常受试者的数据。证实了早期的研究结果,三名受试者在枕叶、顶叶和额叶的广泛区域中,BOLD信号与α波段(8 - 12赫兹)内的平均功率时间序列呈负相关。在小丘脑区域,BOLD信号与α功率呈正相关。对于在数据采集期间表现出两种不同状态的受试者3和4,结果表明相应的相关模式不同,从而证明了结果的状态依赖性。在受试者5中,BOLD变化主要在额叶和颞叶观察到。受试者6仅显示正相关,因此与大多数受试者中发现的BOLD与α功率的负皮质相关性相矛盾。结果表明,静息状态在不同受试者之间存在差异,有时甚至在同一受试者内部也存在差异。由于静息状态在许多fMRI实验中起着重要作用,在比较不同受试者的fMRI结果时,应考虑这种状态的个体间变异性。