背部相关结局评估工具。
Back related outcome assessment instruments.
作者信息
Müller Urs, Röder Christoph, Greenough Charles G
机构信息
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014 Bern, Switzerland.
出版信息
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
Abstract
A literature review of the most widely used condition specific, self administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain had been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects, and available languages were analysed. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. Of similar importance are the content, wording of questions and answers in each of the six questionnaires and an analysis of the different score results. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.
摘要
我们对最广泛使用的针对腰痛的特定病情、自我管理评估问卷进行了文献综述。分析了一般和历史方面、信度、反应度和最小临床重要差异、外部效度、地板效应和天花板效应以及可用语言。然而，这些标准只是考虑因素的一部分。同样重要的是六份问卷中每份问卷的内容、问题和答案的措辞以及对不同评分结果的分析。讨论了评分偏差问题，并给出了建议，以提高各问卷在实际使用中的结构效度。
相似文献
1
Back related outcome assessment instruments.背部相关结局评估工具。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
2
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第一部分：验证
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):301-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
3
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第二部分：量表构建。
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0666-0. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain.跨文化调适与验证斯洛文尼亚版腰痛核心结局测量指标。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 13;21(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03280-8.
5
The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness.腰痛患者赋权量表：信度、内容效度、结构效度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 9;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01758-0.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back).背部核心结局测量指数（COMI Back）匈牙利语版本的跨文化适应与验证
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3750-8. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI).核心结局指标指数（COMI）简体中文版的验证
Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2821-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 在腰痛患者中的测量性能和最小重要变化：系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):287-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
9
Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study.针对腰痛患者的法国版核心结局指标指数的有效性：一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2097-104. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3325-8. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
10
Outcome measures in chronic low back pain.慢性下背痛的疗效评估。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1484-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1353-6. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
引用本文的文献
1
Psychometric Properties of Chosen Scales Evaluating Disability in Low Back Pain-Narrative Review.评估腰痛残疾程度的选定量表的心理测量特性——叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;12(11):1139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111139.
2
Establishing Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (Hindi Version) in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Undergoing Multimodal Physical Therapy.确定魁北克腰痛残疾量表（印地语版）在接受多模式物理治疗的慢性下腰痛患者中的反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;11(4):621. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040621.
3
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症随机临床试验和观察性研究的结局测量的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27218-3.
4
Validation of content and structure of the Return-to-work assessment for post-stroke survivors.中风幸存者重返工作岗位评估内容与结构的验证
S Afr J Physiother. 2022 Oct 27;78(1):1790. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1790. eCollection 2022.
5
Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales.腰痛：各种量表的批判性评估。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Mar;29(3):503-518. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Primary outcome measure use in back pain trials may need radical reassessment.背痛试验中主要结局指标的使用可能需要彻底重新评估。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 14;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0534-1.
7
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.经皮电刺激神经疗法（TENS）与安慰剂治疗慢性下腰痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3.
8
The assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in low back pain patients: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire.下腰痛患者症状及功能受限情况的评估：一份新问卷的效度与信度
Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16(11):1799-811. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0405-z. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
9
Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.胸腰椎脊柱骨折后的疼痛调节与健康相关生活质量
Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16(11):1925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0395-x. Epub 2007 May 23.
10
A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.2006年《欧洲脊柱杂志》中“医学”类文章的一项调查。
Eur Spine J. 2007 Jan;16(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0274-x. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
本文引用的文献
1
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第二部分：量表构建。
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0666-0. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
2
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.腰痛的特定病情结局指标。第一部分：验证
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):301-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
3
Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaires.奥斯威斯利和罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷的希腊语版本。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):40-53. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000068361.47147.79.
4
Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版对强直性脊柱炎患者的残疾情况进行评估。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb;62(2):140-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.2.140.
5
Validation of the spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯问卷西班牙语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):538-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00016.
6
The reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score for back pain.下背痛的下背部结果评分的可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00017.
7
A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.五种下背部功能障碍问卷的比较：可靠性与反应性
Phys Ther. 2002 Jan;82(1):8-24. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.8.
8
Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain.用于腰痛的罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 15;26(24):2738-43. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00024.
9
ICF approved as the successor of ICIDH.国际功能、残疾和健康分类（ICF）被批准为国际疾病分类的功能、残疾和健康分类（ICIDH）的继任者。
J Rehabil Med. 2001 Sep;33(5):193-4. doi: 10.1080/165019701750419545.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation of the lumbar North American Spine Society questionnaire for Italian-speaking patients with lumbar spinal disease.针对讲意大利语的腰椎疾病患者，对北美脊柱协会腰椎问卷进行跨文化适应性调整。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Aug 1;26(15):E344-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200108010-00012.
Zotero 插件