Müller Urs, Röder Christoph, Greenough Charles G
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014 Bern, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
A literature review of the most widely used condition specific, self administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain had been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects, and available languages were analysed. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. Of similar importance are the content, wording of questions and answers in each of the six questionnaires and an analysis of the different score results. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.
我们对最广泛使用的针对腰痛的特定病情、自我管理评估问卷进行了文献综述。分析了一般和历史方面、信度、反应度和最小临床重要差异、外部效度、地板效应和天花板效应以及可用语言。然而，这些标准只是考虑因素的一部分。同样重要的是六份问卷中每份问卷的内容、问题和答案的措辞以及对不同评分结果的分析。讨论了评分偏差问题，并给出了建议，以提高各问卷在实际使用中的结构效度。
