文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

背部相关结局评估工具。

Back related outcome assessment instruments.

作者信息

Müller Urs, Röder Christoph, Greenough Charles G

机构信息

Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16.


DOI:10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8
PMID:16292633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3454553/
Abstract

A literature review of the most widely used condition specific, self administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain had been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects, and available languages were analysed. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. Of similar importance are the content, wording of questions and answers in each of the six questionnaires and an analysis of the different score results. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.

摘要

我们对最广泛使用的针对腰痛的特定病情、自我管理评估问卷进行了文献综述。分析了一般和历史方面、信度、反应度和最小临床重要差异、外部效度、地板效应和天花板效应以及可用语言。然而,这些标准只是考虑因素的一部分。同样重要的是六份问卷中每份问卷的内容、问题和答案的措辞以及对不同评分结果的分析。讨论了评分偏差问题,并给出了建议,以提高各问卷在实际使用中的结构效度。

相似文献

[1]
Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Eur Spine J. 2006-1

[2]
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Eur Spine J. 2004-7

[3]
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

Eur Spine J. 2004-7

[4]
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-4-13

[5]
The patient enablement instrument for back pain: reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021-4-9

[6]
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back).

Eur Spine J. 2016-1

[7]
Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI).

Eur Spine J. 2013-12

[8]
Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023-2

[9]
Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study.

Eur Spine J. 2014-10

[10]
Outcome measures in chronic low back pain.

Eur Spine J. 2010-4-17

引用本文的文献

[1]
Psychometric Properties of Chosen Scales Evaluating Disability in Low Back Pain-Narrative Review.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024-6-3

[2]
Establishing Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (Hindi Version) in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Undergoing Multimodal Physical Therapy.

Healthcare (Basel). 2023-2-20

[3]
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Sci Rep. 2023-1-19

[4]
Validation of content and structure of the Return-to-work assessment for post-stroke survivors.

S Afr J Physiother. 2022-10-27

[5]
Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales.

Eur Spine J. 2020-3

[6]
Primary outcome measure use in back pain trials may need radical reassessment.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015-4-14

[7]
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-10-8

[8]
The assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in low back pain patients: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire.

Eur Spine J. 2007-11

[9]
Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.

Eur Spine J. 2007-11

[10]
A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Eur Spine J. 2007-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

Eur Spine J. 2004-7

[2]
Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Eur Spine J. 2004-7

[3]
Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaires.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003-6

[4]
Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2003-2

[5]
Validation of the spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002-3-1

[6]
The reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score for back pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002-1-15

[7]
A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

Phys Ther. 2002-1

[8]
Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-12-15

[9]
ICF approved as the successor of ICIDH.

J Rehabil Med. 2001-9

[10]
Cross-cultural adaptation of the lumbar North American Spine Society questionnaire for Italian-speaking patients with lumbar spinal disease.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-8-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索