Müller U, Duetz M S, Roeder C, Greenough C G
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, P.O. Box 8354, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):301-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
A literature review of the nine most widely used, condition-specific, self-administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain has been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects and available languages were analysed for the nine most-used outcome tools. When considering which condition-specific measure to employ, the present overview on assessment tools should provide the necessary information to define the technical aspects of the nine questionnaires. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. In part II the construction of these scales in relationship to the measurement domains will be evaluated.
我们对九种最常用的针对腰痛的特定病情自我管理评估问卷进行了文献综述。分析了九种最常用的结局工具的一般和历史方面、可靠性、反应性和最小临床重要差异、外部效度、地板效应和天花板效应以及可用语言。在考虑采用哪种特定病情测量方法时，本评估工具概述应提供必要信息，以界定这九种问卷的技术方面。然而，这些标准只是考虑因素的一部分。在第二部分中，将评估这些量表与测量领域相关的构建情况。
