Suppr超能文献

VIDAS艰难梭菌毒素A免疫测定法与艰难梭菌培养法、细胞毒素法及乳胶试验的比较

Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C. difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests.

作者信息

Shanholtzer C J, Willard K E, Holter J J, Olson M M, Gerding D N, Peterson L R

机构信息

Clinical Microbiology Section, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1837-40. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1837-1840.1992.

Abstract

The VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay (CDA) is a new, automated, enzyme-linked fluorescent-antibody assay for detection of C. difficile toxin A antigen in stool specimens. Simultaneous, parallel testing was performed by using the VIDAS CDA, the Culturette brand CDT latex test for C. difficile antigens, and conventional laboratory cell culture tests for C. difficile, cytotoxicity and C. difficile culture. One hundred ninety-four consecutive fresh soft or liquid stool samples submitted for C. difficile testing between July and September 1990 were evaluated. Of the 194 samples tested, 19 (10%) were from 16 patients who met our case definition for C. difficile-associated disease. The in vitro tests were evaluated in relation to two forms of a clinical case definition. In one form, a positive culture for toxin-producing C. difficile or a positive cytotoxin result obtained directly from the stool specimen was required as laboratory evidence of C. difficile. In the other, a positive result of any of the four laboratory tests was accepted for the laboratory portion of the case definition. No significant difference between the sensitivity of the VIDAS CDA and that of the Culturette brand CDT latex test was found (48 to 58% sensitivity for the CDT latex test and 52 to 63% sensitivity for the VIDAS CDA compared with 93 to 100% sensitivity for culture and 70 to 100% sensitivity for cytotoxin testing). The performance of the VIDAS CDA, however, was hampered by a high percentage of tests (19%) which gave an uninterpretable result.

摘要

VIDAS艰难梭菌毒素A免疫测定法(CDA)是一种新型的自动化酶联荧光抗体测定法,用于检测粪便标本中的艰难梭菌毒素A抗原。同时,采用VIDAS CDA、Culturette品牌的艰难梭菌抗原CDT乳胶试验以及传统实验室细胞培养试验(用于艰难梭菌、细胞毒性和艰难梭菌培养)进行平行检测。对1990年7月至9月期间提交的194份连续新鲜软便或液体粪便样本进行艰难梭菌检测评估。在检测的194份样本中,19份(10%)来自16名符合我们艰难梭菌相关疾病病例定义的患者。针对两种临床病例定义形式对体外试验进行评估。一种形式是,产毒素艰难梭菌培养阳性或直接从粪便标本获得的细胞毒素结果阳性作为艰难梭菌的实验室证据。另一种形式是,病例定义的实验室部分接受四项实验室检测中任何一项的阳性结果。VIDAS CDA与Culturette品牌的CDT乳胶试验的敏感性之间未发现显著差异(CDT乳胶试验的敏感性为48%至58%,VIDAS CDA的敏感性为52%至63%,而培养的敏感性为93%至100%,细胞毒素检测的敏感性为70%至100%)。然而,VIDAS CDA的性能受到高比例(19%)无法解释结果的检测的阻碍。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Clostridium difficile.艰难梭菌
Clin Lab Med. 2010 Mar;30(1):329-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.001.

本文引用的文献

3
Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins.艰难梭菌:其所致疾病与毒素
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):1-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.1.1.1.
4
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的实验室诊断
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;7(4):476-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01962596.
7
Nosocomial Clostridium difficile colonisation and disease.医院内艰难梭菌定植与疾病
Lancet. 1990 Jul 14;336(8707):97-100. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91605-a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验