Kim Heejung, Kim Wan Hee, Kim Myungsook, Jeong Seok Hoon, Lee Kyungwon
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2014 May;34(3):235-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.235. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
We evaluated the new C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (CD COMPLETE; TechLab, USA), which is a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay that uses a combination of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen and toxin A and B detection. A total of 608 consecutive loose stool specimens collected from the patients with suspected Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) from August to December 2012 were subjected to the CD COMPLETE and VIDAS Clostridium difficile A & B (VIDAS CDAB; bioMérieux, France). Their performances were compared with a toxigenic culture as a reference. Stool specimens that were culture-negative and CD COMPLETE- or VIDAS CDAB-positive were analyzed by using an enrichment procedure. In comparison to the toxigenic cultures, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were 63.6%, 98.0%, 76.1%, and 96.4%, respectively, for the CD COMPLETE-toxin and 75.5%, 97.4%, 72.5%, and 97.8%, respectively, for the VIDAS CDAB. In comparison to the enriched C. difficile cultures, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the CD COMPLETE-GDH were 91.0%, 92.4%, 70.5%, and 98.1%, respectively. The CD COMPLETE is a reliable method for the diagnosis of CDI and provides greater sensitivity than toxin enzyme immunoassay alone. Furthermore, the CD COMPLETE-GDH has advantages over direct culture in detecting C. difficile.
我们评估了新型艰难梭菌快速检测综合法(CD综合法;美国TechLab公司),这是一种快速膜酶免疫测定法,它结合了谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)抗原以及毒素A和B的检测。2012年8月至12月期间,从疑似艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者中连续收集了608份稀便样本,对其进行CD综合法检测以及VIDAS艰难梭菌A和B检测(VIDAS CDAB;法国生物梅里埃公司)。将它们的检测性能与作为参考的产毒培养法进行比较。对培养阴性但CD综合法或VIDAS CDAB检测呈阳性的粪便样本采用富集程序进行分析。与产毒培养法相比,CD综合法检测毒素的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为63.6%、98.0%、76.1%和96.4%,而VIDAS CDAB的相应值分别为75.5%、97.4%、72.5%和97.8%。与富集后的艰难梭菌培养法相比,CD综合法检测GDH的灵敏度、特异度、PPV和NPV分别为91.0%、92.4%、70.5%和98.1%。CD综合法是诊断CDI的可靠方法,且比单独的毒素酶免疫测定法具有更高的灵敏度。此外,在检测艰难梭菌方面,CD综合法检测GDH比直接培养法具有优势。