Suppr超能文献

损伤控制骨科在多发伤患者中是有效、省时且安全的。

Damage control orthopedics in patients with multiple injuries is effective, time saving, and safe.

作者信息

Taeger Georg, Ruchholtz Steffen, Waydhas Christian, Lewan Ulrike, Schmidt Boris, Nast-Kolb Dieter

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2005 Aug;59(2):409-16; discussion 417. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000175088.29170.3e.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although early fracture fixation is expedient in patients with multiple injuries, early total care (ETC) may be associated with posttraumatic systemic complications. This study was conducted to prospectively evaluate the concept of damage control by immediate external fracture fixation (damage control orthopedics [DCO]) and consecutive conversion osteosynthesis with regard to time savings, effectiveness, and safety.

METHODS

In a prospective controlled trial, a cohort of 1,070 patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 20.7 were admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 3.5-year period. Patients with an ISS > 15, survival of more than 24 hours, and without interhospital transfer were included. In all patients with major fractures requiring immediate stabilization, external fixation was performed (DCO). Conversion was executed at the earliest possible time as a one-stage procedure after stabilization of organ functions. TRISS was calculated for patients requiring DCO (DCO group) and for patients without major fractures (control group). Time spent on particular and all surgical procedures, blood loss, and complications of DCO were compared with data of consecutive conversion osteosyntheses which were considered as hypothetical ETC procedures (h-ETC) in identical patients.

RESULTS

Four hundred nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seventy-five (ISS of 37.3) required DCO for 135 fractures, whereas 334 patients (ISS of 30.4) did not require immediate fracture fixation. Mean surgical time was 62 +/- 30 minutes (SEM, 3.5) for DCO. Because of fracture consolidation with external fixation (n = 3) and injury-related death (n = 15), conversion (h-ETC) was performed in 57 patients for 101 fractures. Duration of external fixation averaged 13.7 days (range, 3-46 days). Fifty-five patients (96.5%) required intensive care treatment and 42 patients (73.7%) required mechanical ventilation at the time of conversion. Mean operation time for conversion was 233 +/- 19 minutes (SEM, 18.7) with a value of p < 0.001. Also, blood loss was significantly (p < 0.001) different for DCO (<50 mL) and h-ETC (472 mL; SEM, 63). Pin-track infections were identified in five patients, two patients with acetabular plate osteosynthesis had deep wound infection, and one patient died related to bacterial sepsis with infections of all wound sites. Overall mortality in DCO patients was significantly lower than predicted by TRISS (20% vs. 39.3%), as it was in the 334 patients without immediate fracture fixation (29.5% vs. 24.3%).

CONCLUSION

DCO appears to provide a major reduction of operation time and blood loss in the primary treatment period in severely injured patients compared with h-ETC. In addition, we found that DCO is not associated with an increased rate of procedure-related complications. So far, DCO with early and one-stage conversion seems to be a safe strategy of primary fracture treatment in patients with multiple injuries.

摘要

背景

尽管早期骨折固定对于多发伤患者较为便捷,但早期全面治疗(ETC)可能与创伤后全身并发症相关。本研究旨在前瞻性评估通过立即进行外固定骨折固定(损伤控制骨科[DCO])以及随后的连续性切开复位内固定在节省时间、有效性和安全性方面的损伤控制概念。

方法

在一项前瞻性对照试验中,1070例损伤严重度评分(ISS)为20.7的患者在3.5年期间被收入一级创伤中心。纳入ISS>15、存活超过24小时且未进行院间转运的患者。所有需要立即稳定的主要骨折患者均进行外固定(DCO)。在器官功能稳定后尽早作为一期手术进行切开复位内固定。计算需要DCO的患者(DCO组)和无主要骨折的患者(对照组)的TRISS。将DCO患者特定和所有手术操作所花费的时间、失血量以及DCO的并发症与相同患者连续性切开复位内固定的数据进行比较,连续性切开复位内固定被视为假设的ETC手术(h-ETC)。

结果

409例患者符合纳入标准。75例(ISS为37.3)因135处骨折需要DCO,而334例患者(ISS为30.4)不需要立即进行骨折固定。DCO的平均手术时间为62±30分钟(SEM,3.5)。由于外固定骨折愈合(n = 3)和与损伤相关的死亡(n = 15),57例患者因101处骨折进行了切开复位内固定(h-ETC)。外固定的平均持续时间为13.7天(范围3 - 46天)。55例患者(96.5%)在切开复位内固定时需要重症监护治疗,42例患者(73.7%)需要机械通气。切开复位内固定的平均手术时间为233±19分钟(SEM,18.7),p值<0.001。此外,DCO(<50 mL)和h-ETC(472 mL;SEM,63)的失血量也存在显著差异(p<0.001)。5例患者出现针道感染,2例髋臼钢板切开复位内固定患者发生深部伤口感染,1例患者因所有伤口部位感染导致细菌性败血症死亡。DCO患者的总体死亡率显著低于TRISS预测值(20%对39.3%),未立即进行骨折固定的334例患者也是如此(29.5%对24.3%)。

结论

与h-ETC相比,DCO似乎能在严重受伤患者的初始治疗阶段显著减少手术时间和失血量。此外,我们发现DCO与手术相关并发症发生率增加无关。到目前为止,早期一期切开复位内固定的DCO似乎是多发伤患者骨折初始治疗的一种安全策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验