De Renzi E, Faglioni P
Neurological Department, University of Modena, Italy.
Cortex. 1978 Mar;14(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80006-9.
A 36-item-version of the Token Test is described and normative data obtained from its administration to 215 normal subjects are given. Years of schooling (but not age) were found to significantly affect the performance. The scores were corrected for this factor and the lower limit of the 90% tolerance interval around the mean of the adjusted scores was determined: it was found to correspond to 29 and left below it exactly 5% of the normal sample. The test was given to 200 aphasic patients. Fourteen (7%) were found to have an adjusted score of 29 or more, namely would have been classified as non-aphasic. This is a percentage remarkably smaller than that (40%) obtained with a 10 sentence comprehension test, which supports previous studies pointing to the sensitivity of the Token Test to the presence of oral language disorders. On the basis of the aphasic patients' performance, cutting scores allowing evaluation of the severity of the comprehension deficit are provided. The 36-item-version of the test appears to be an useful and convenient device to diagnose aphasic impairment of language comprehension.
本文描述了一项包含36个项目的代币测试,并给出了对215名正常受试者进行该测试所获得的常模数据。研究发现,受教育年限(而非年龄)会显著影响测试表现。针对这一因素对分数进行了校正,并确定了校正后分数均值周围90%容忍区间的下限:结果发现该下限对应于29分,正常样本中恰好有5%的人分数低于此值。对200名失语症患者进行了该测试。发现有14名(7%)患者校正后的分数为29分或更高,也就是说他们本应被归类为非失语症患者。这一百分比显著低于在一项10句理解测试中得到的百分比(40%),这支持了之前指向代币测试对口语语言障碍敏感性的研究。基于失语症患者的表现,提供了能够评估理解缺陷严重程度的划界分数。该测试的36项版本似乎是诊断失语症患者语言理解障碍的一种有用且便捷的工具。