Cartagena Rafael, Gaiser Robert R
Department of Anesthesia, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Nov;17(7):528-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.002.
To determine whether threading an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm affects its intravascular placement and paresthesias.
Prospective randomized study.
Labor and Delivery Unit, University Medical Center.
Eighty parturients.
All patients received epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: threading the epidural catheter 5 cm (5-cm group) or threading the epidural catheter 10 cm and retracting 5 cm (10-cm group). In the 10-cm group, the epidural catheter was threaded 10 cm and pulled back 5 cm. In the 5-cm group, the epidural catheter was threaded 5 cm.
Placement of the epidural catheter intravascularly, the presence of a paresthesia, and bilateral sensory levels were measured. There was no difference in the frequency of intravascular placement between 10- and 5-cm groups, 10.2% vs 7.5%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a higher frequency of paresthesia in the 10-cm group, 15.4% vs 7.5%, and a lower frequency of uneven sensory levels in the 10-cm group, 15% vs 2.6%.
There is no clear clinical benefit or disadvantage to threading an epidural catheter 10 cm into the epidural space then withdrawing it 5 cm. Further study is warranted.
确定将硬膜外导管置入10厘米然后回撤5厘米是否会影响其血管内放置情况及感觉异常。
前瞻性随机研究。
大学医学中心的产科病房。
80名产妇。
所有患者均接受硬膜外麻醉。患者被随机分为两组:将硬膜外导管置入5厘米(5厘米组)或将硬膜外导管置入10厘米然后回撤5厘米(10厘米组)。在10厘米组中,硬膜外导管置入10厘米后回撤5厘米。在5厘米组中,硬膜外导管置入5厘米。
测量硬膜外导管的血管内放置情况、感觉异常的出现情况以及双侧感觉平面。10厘米组和5厘米组的血管内放置频率无差异,分别为10.2%和7.5%。虽然无统计学意义,但10厘米组感觉异常的频率有升高趋势,为15.4%对7.5%,且10厘米组感觉平面不均匀的频率较低,为15%对2.6%。
将硬膜外导管置入硬膜外间隙10厘米然后回撤5厘米,在临床上没有明显的益处或弊端。有必要进行进一步研究。