Bouman E A C, Gramke H F, Wetzel N, Vanderbroeck T H T, Bruinsma R, Theunissen M, Kerkkamp H E M, Marcus M A E
University Hospital Maastricht, Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2007;58(2):101-5.
Although epidural anesthesia is considered safe, several complications may occur during puncture and insertion of a catheter. Incidences of paresthesia vary between 0.2 and 56%. A prospective, open, cohort-controlled pilot study was conducted in 188 patients, ASA I-III, age 19-87 years, scheduled for elective surgery and epidural anesthesia. We evaluated a 20 G polyamide (standard) catheter and a 20 G combined polyurethane-polyamide (new) catheter. Spontaneous reactions upon catheter-insertion, paresthesia on questioning, inadvertent dural or intravascular puncture, and reasons for early catheter removal were recorded. The incidence of paresthesia reported spontaneously was 21.3% with the standard catheter and 16.7% with the new catheter. Systematically asking for paresthesia almost doubled the paraesthesia rate. Intravascular cannulation occurred in 5%. No accidental dural punctures occurred. An overall incidence of 13.3% of technical problems led to early catheter removal. The new catheter was at least equivalent to the standard regarding epidural success rate and safety : rate of paresthesia, intravascular and dural cannulation.
尽管硬膜外麻醉被认为是安全的,但在穿刺和插入导管过程中仍可能出现一些并发症。感觉异常的发生率在0.2%至56%之间。对188例年龄在19至87岁、ASA分级为I-III级、计划进行择期手术并接受硬膜外麻醉的患者进行了一项前瞻性、开放性、队列对照试验研究。我们评估了一种20G聚酰胺(标准)导管和一种20G聚氨酯-聚酰胺组合(新型)导管。记录了导管插入时的自发反应、询问时的感觉异常、意外硬膜或血管穿刺以及早期拔除导管的原因。标准导管自发报告的感觉异常发生率为21.3%,新型导管为16.7%。系统性询问感觉异常使感觉异常发生率几乎翻倍。血管内插管发生率为5%。未发生意外硬膜穿刺。13.3%的技术问题导致早期导管拔除。新型导管在硬膜外成功率和安全性方面至少与标准导管相当:感觉异常率、血管和硬膜插管率。