Tousignant-Laflamme Yannick, Marchand Serge
Université de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Neurosurgery, 3001, 12e avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Qué., Canada J1H 5N4.
Eur J Pain. 2006 Oct;10(7):603-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
Rehabilitation professionals are currently using heart rate (HR) in order to assess the sincerity of effort in certain evaluations. It has been shown that a relation exists between HR and pain but no study has measured cardiac response during both clinical and experimental pain among a patient population using an intra-subject design. Thirty patients with low back pain (LBP) participated in this study including 16 men. Clinical pain was induced by applying a postero-anterior pressure (PA) on a painful lumbar segment for 15 and 30s in order to reproduce the patient's typical LBP at an intensity ranging between 50 and 70/100. Experimental pain was induced with a 15s thermal stimulus at a temperature which reproduced the same pain intensity as the 15s PA. For both reproduced clinical pain durations, we observed a rise in HR ranging between 8.5% and 12.67%. However, unlike men, women's cardiac response failed to show a constant rise in HR during the 30s PA. For all subjects, the rise in HR was much lower during the experimental pain condition (p<0.001), reaching only 5%. On the other hand, galvanic skin responses were significantly higher during the experimental pain condition (p<0.001). During this same condition, women also had a greater rise in galvanic skin responses than men (p=0.04). Finally, a significant correlation was found between both types of pain. These results suggest that pain induced during a clinical evaluation will produce a significant HR augmentation. However, heart rate variability analysis showed greater sympathetic cardiac regulation for men. The sex differences observed in this study call for caution when interpreting HR during pain assessment.
康复专业人员目前正在使用心率(HR)来评估某些评估中努力的真实性。研究表明,心率与疼痛之间存在关联,但尚无研究采用受试者内设计测量患者群体在临床疼痛和实验性疼痛期间的心脏反应。30名腰痛(LBP)患者参与了本研究,其中包括16名男性。通过在疼痛的腰椎节段施加前后压力(PA)15秒和30秒来诱发临床疼痛,以再现患者典型的LBP,强度范围在50至70/100之间。实验性疼痛通过15秒的热刺激诱发,温度与15秒PA产生相同的疼痛强度。对于两种再现的临床疼痛持续时间,我们观察到心率上升幅度在8.5%至12.67%之间。然而,与男性不同,女性的心脏反应在30秒PA期间未能显示心率持续上升。对于所有受试者,在实验性疼痛状态下心率上升幅度要低得多(p<0.001),仅达到5%。另一方面,在实验性疼痛状态下,皮肤电反应明显更高(p<0.001)。在相同状态下,女性的皮肤电反应上升幅度也比男性更大(p=0.04)。最后,发现两种疼痛类型之间存在显著相关性。这些结果表明,临床评估期间诱发的疼痛将导致心率显著增加。然而,心率变异性分析显示男性的交感神经心脏调节作用更强。本研究中观察到的性别差异提醒在疼痛评估期间解释心率时要谨慎。