Van Abbema Dana L, Bauer Patricia J
St. Mary's College of Maryland, MD 20686, USA.
Memory. 2005 Nov;13(8):829-45. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000430.
To address the question of whether memories from early childhood survive into later childhood, participants visited the laboratory at age 3 and again at 7, 8, or 9. At age 3, each talked with a parent about six events; at the later age each child talked with a researcher about four of these distant events as well as two more recent events. School-aged children recalled fewer than half of the distant events introduced. Further, the proportion of distant events recalled was negatively correlated with age. Those distant events that were recalled, however, were recounted in an accurate, detailed manner. Importantly, reports of distant events did not reflect the full extent of children's narrative ability. Reports of recent events were more coherent and included twice the detail. Implications for existing interpretations of autobiographical memory and childhood amnesia are discussed, and the need for further research employing innovative methods is emphasised.
为了探究幼儿期的记忆能否留存至童年后期,参与者在3岁时到访实验室,之后在7岁、8岁或9岁时再次前来。3岁时,每个孩子与一位家长谈论六件事;在稍大一些的年龄,每个孩子与一名研究人员谈论其中四件久远的事以及另外两件较近发生的事。学龄儿童回忆起的久远事件不到所提及事件的一半。此外,回忆起的久远事件的比例与年龄呈负相关。然而,那些被回忆起的久远事件,孩子们都能准确、详细地讲述。重要的是,对久远事件的描述并未反映出儿童叙事能力的全部水平。对近期事件的描述更连贯,细节也多了一倍。本文讨论了对自传体记忆和童年失忆症现有解释的影响,并强调了采用创新方法进行进一步研究的必要性。