• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推导用于指导钝性创伤性脑损伤患者院间转运的临床决策规则。

Derivation of a clinical decision rule to guide the interhospital transfer of patients with blunt traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Newgard C D, Hedges J R, Stone J V, Lenfesty B, Diggs B, Arthur M, Mullins R J

机构信息

Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2005 Dec;22(12):855-60. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.020206.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2004.020206
PMID:16299192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1726623/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To derive a clinical decision rule for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) that enables early identification of patients requiring specialised trauma care.

METHODS

We collected data from 1999 through 2003 on a retrospective cohort of consecutive people aged 18-65 years with a serious head injury (AIS > or =3), transported directly from the scene of injury, and evaluated in the ED. Information on 22 demographical, physiological, radiographic, and lab variables was collected. Resource based "high therapeutic intensity" measures occurring within 72 hours of ED arrival (the outcome measure) were identified a priori and included: neurosurgical intervention, exploratory laparotomy, intensive care interventions, or death. We used classification and regression tree analysis to derive and cross validate the decision rule.

RESULTS

504 consecutive trauma patients were identified as having a serious head injury: 246 (49%) required at least one of the HTI measures. Five ED variables (GCS, respiratory rate, age, temperature, and pulse rate) identified subjects requiring at least one of the HTI measures with 94% sensitivity (95% CI 91 to 97%) and 63% specificity (95% CI 57 to 69%) in the derivation sample, and 90% sensitivity and 55% specificity using cross validation.

CONCLUSIONS

This decision rule identified among a cohort of head injured patients evaluated in the ED the majority of those who urgently required specialised trauma care. The rule will require prospective validation in injured people presenting to non-tertiary care hospitals before implementation can be recommended.

摘要

目的

推导一个针对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的临床决策规则,以便早期识别需要专科创伤护理的患者。

方法

我们收集了1999年至2003年的数据,这些数据来自一个回顾性队列,该队列中的患者为连续的18 - 65岁严重头部损伤(简明损伤定级[AIS]≥3)患者,他们从受伤现场直接转运而来,并在急诊科接受评估。收集了22个人口统计学、生理学、影像学和实验室变量的信息。预先确定了在急诊科就诊后72小时内出现的基于资源的“高治疗强度”措施(结局指标),包括:神经外科干预、剖腹探查术、重症监护干预或死亡。我们使用分类和回归树分析来推导并交叉验证该决策规则。

结果

504例连续创伤患者被确定为严重头部损伤:246例(49%)至少需要一项高治疗强度措施。五个急诊科变量(格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]、呼吸频率、年龄、体温和脉搏率)在推导样本中识别出需要至少一项高治疗强度措施的受试者,灵敏度为94%(95%置信区间91%至97%),特异度为63%(95%置信区间57%至69%),交叉验证时灵敏度为90%,特异度为55%。

结论

该决策规则在急诊科评估的一组头部受伤患者中识别出了大多数急需专科创伤护理的患者。在推荐实施之前,该规则需要在非三级护理医院就诊的受伤患者中进行前瞻性验证。

相似文献

1
Derivation of a clinical decision rule to guide the interhospital transfer of patients with blunt traumatic brain injury.推导用于指导钝性创伤性脑损伤患者院间转运的临床决策规则。
Emerg Med J. 2005 Dec;22(12):855-60. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.020206.
2
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
3
Early neurosurgical procedures enhance survival in blunt head injury: propensity score analysis.早期神经外科手术可提高钝性颅脑损伤患者的生存率:倾向评分分析
J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
4
Prospective validation of an out-of-hospital decision rule to identify seriously injured children involved in motor vehicle crashes.用于识别涉及机动车碰撞的重伤儿童的院外决策规则的前瞻性验证。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Aug;12(8):679-87. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.03.526.
5
Time to definitive care for patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury--does a trauma system matter?中度和重度创伤性脑损伤患者获得确定性治疗的时间——创伤系统重要吗?
N Z Med J. 2009 Sep 11;122(1302):40-6.
6
Performance of a decision rule to predict need for computed tomography among children with blunt head trauma.一种预测钝性头部创伤儿童是否需要进行计算机断层扫描的决策规则的性能。
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):e238-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1063. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
7
A clinical decision rule to predict adult patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage who do not require intensive care unit admission.一种用于预测成人创伤性颅内出血患者无需入住重症监护病房的临床决策规则。
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.020. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
Variability of trauma transfer practices among non-tertiary care hospital emergency departments.非三级护理医院急诊科创伤转运实践的差异
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;13(7):746-54. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.014. Epub 2006 May 24.
9
The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma.阿姆斯特丹腕部规则:一项关于急性腕部创伤中使用X线摄影的临床决策规则的多中心前瞻性推导及外部验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 18;16:389. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2.
10
Derivation of the Quebec Brain Injury Categories for complicated mild traumatic brain injuries.魁北克复杂轻度外伤性脑损伤分类的推导。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Jul 12;141(6):1730-1738. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.JNS24183. Print 2024 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalization and readmission after single-level fall: a population-based sample.单级跌倒后的住院治疗和再入院情况:基于人群的样本。
Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 19;10(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00463-4.
2
Assessment of Hospital Characteristics and Interhospital Transfer Patterns of Adults With Emergency General Surgery Conditions.评估具有急诊普通外科疾病的成年人的医院特征和医院间转院模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123389. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23389.
3
A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.关于在医学与医疗保健领域使用机器学习方法开发准确且动态预测模型的批判性综述。
J Med Syst. 2017 Apr;41(4):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0715-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
4
Low rate of delayed deterioration requiring surgical treatment in patients transferred to a tertiary care center for mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤患者转至三级护理中心后,需要手术治疗的延迟恶化发生率较低。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Nov;29(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.FOCUS10182.
5
Validation of length of hospital stay as a surrogate measure for injury severity and resource use among injury survivors.验证住院时间作为伤害幸存者严重程度和资源利用的替代指标的有效性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):142-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00647.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Severe head injury in children: geographical range of an emergency neurosurgical practice.儿童重型颅脑损伤:急诊神经外科业务的地理范围
Emerg Med J. 2004 Jul;21(4):433-7.
2
Evaluation of management of road trauma survivors with brain injury and neurologic disability in Victoria.维多利亚州脑损伤和神经功能障碍道路创伤幸存者的管理评估。
J Trauma. 2004 Jan;56(1):137-49. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000056163.58047.74.
3
Trauma team activation criteria as predictors of patient disposition from the emergency department.作为急诊科患者处置预测指标的创伤团队启动标准。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01364.x.
4
A prehospital glasgow coma scale score < or = 14 accurately predicts the need for full trauma team activation and patient hospitalization after motor vehicle collisions.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤14能准确预测机动车碰撞后是否需要启动完整的创伤团队以及患者是否需要住院治疗。
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):503-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00018.
5
Use of out-of-hospital variables to predict severity of injury in pediatric patients involved in motor vehicle crashes.利用院外变量预测机动车碰撞事故中儿科患者的损伤严重程度。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 May;39(5):481-91. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.123549.
6
The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality.创伤护理组织系统对机动车碰撞死亡率的影响。
JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):1990-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.1990.
7
Prehospital triage in the injured pediatric patient.受伤儿童患者的院前分诊
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Jan;35(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)80019-6.
8
Population-based research assessing the effectiveness of trauma systems.基于人群的创伤系统有效性评估研究。
J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3 Suppl):S59-66. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909001-00013.
9
Systematic review of trauma system effectiveness based on registry comparisons.基于登记数据比较的创伤系统有效性的系统评价
J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3 Suppl):S46-55. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909001-00011.
10
Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness.关于创伤系统有效性的已发表证据的系统评价。
J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3 Suppl):S25-33. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909001-00007.