Chain Patrick S G, Comerci Diego J, Tolmasky Marcelo E, Larimer Frank W, Malfatti Stephanie A, Vergez Lisa M, Aguero Fernan, Land Miriam L, Ugalde Rodolfo A, Garcia Emilio
Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA.
Infect Immun. 2005 Dec;73(12):8353-61. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8353-8361.2005.
Despite their high DNA identity and a proposal to group classical Brucella species as biovars of Brucella melitensis, the commonly recognized Brucella species can be distinguished by distinct biochemical and fatty acid characters, as well as by a marked host range (e.g., Brucella suis for swine, B. melitensis for sheep and goats, and Brucella abortus for cattle). Here we present the genome of B. abortus 2308, the virulent prototype biovar 1 strain, and its comparison to the two other human pathogenic Brucella species and to B. abortus field isolate 9-941. The global distribution of pseudogenes, deletions, and insertions supports previous indications that B. abortus and B. melitensis share a common ancestor that diverged from B. suis. With the exception of a dozen genes, the genetic complements of both B. abortus strains are identical, whereas the three species differ in gene content and pseudogenes. The pattern of species-specific gene inactivations affecting transcriptional regulators and outer membrane proteins suggests that these inactivations may play an important role in the establishment of host specificity and may have been a primary driver of speciation in the genus Brucella. Despite being nonmotile, the brucellae contain flagellum gene clusters and display species-specific flagellar gene inactivations, which lead to the putative generation of different versions of flagellum-derived structures and may contribute to differences in host specificity and virulence. Metabolic changes such as the lack of complete metabolic pathways for the synthesis of numerous compounds (e.g., glycogen, biotin, NAD, and choline) are consistent with adaptation of brucellae to an intracellular life-style.
尽管经典布鲁氏菌物种具有高度的DNA同一性,并且有人提议将其归类为羊种布鲁氏菌的生物变种,但公认的布鲁氏菌物种可以通过独特的生化和脂肪酸特征以及明显的宿主范围来区分(例如,猪种布鲁氏菌感染猪,羊种布鲁氏菌感染绵羊和山羊,牛种布鲁氏菌感染牛)。在此,我们展示了牛种布鲁氏菌2308(强毒原型生物变种1菌株)的基因组,并将其与另外两种人类致病布鲁氏菌物种以及牛种布鲁氏菌野外分离株9-941进行比较。假基因、缺失和插入的全局分布支持了先前的迹象,即牛种布鲁氏菌和羊种布鲁氏菌有一个与猪种布鲁氏菌分化的共同祖先。除了十几个基因外,两种牛种布鲁氏菌菌株的基因互补是相同的,而这三个物种在基因含量和假基因方面存在差异。影响转录调节因子和外膜蛋白的物种特异性基因失活模式表明,这些失活可能在宿主特异性的建立中起重要作用,并且可能是布鲁氏菌属物种形成的主要驱动力。尽管布鲁氏菌不具有运动性,但它们含有鞭毛基因簇,并表现出物种特异性的鞭毛基因失活,这导致了不同版本的鞭毛衍生结构的推定产生,可能有助于宿主特异性和毒力的差异。代谢变化,如缺乏多种化合物(如糖原、生物素、NAD和胆碱)合成的完整代谢途径,与布鲁氏菌适应细胞内生活方式一致。