Hsiao William W L, Ung Korine, Aeschliman Dana, Bryan Jenny, Finlay B Brett, Brinkman Fiona S L
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
PLoS Genet. 2005 Nov;1(5):e62. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010062. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
Microbial genes that are "novel" (no detectable homologs in other species) have become of increasing interest as environmental sampling suggests that there are many more such novel genes in yet-to-be-cultured microorganisms. By analyzing known microbial genomic islands and prophages, we developed criteria for systematic identification of putative genomic islands (clusters of genes of probable horizontal origin in a prokaryotic genome) in 63 prokaryotic genomes, and then characterized the distribution of novel genes and other features. All but a few of the genomes examined contained significantly higher proportions of novel genes in their predicted genomic islands compared with the rest of their genome (Paired t test = 4.43E-14 to 1.27E-18, depending on method). Moreover, the reverse observation (i.e., higher proportions of novel genes outside of islands) never reached statistical significance in any organism examined. We show that this higher proportion of novel genes in predicted genomic islands is not due to less accurate gene prediction in genomic island regions, but likely reflects a genuine increase in novel genes in these regions for both bacteria and archaea. This represents the first comprehensive analysis of novel genes in prokaryotic genomic islands and provides clues regarding the origin of novel genes. Our collective results imply that there are different gene pools associated with recently horizontally transmitted genomic regions versus regions that are primarily vertically inherited. Moreover, there are more novel genes within the gene pool associated with genomic islands. Since genomic islands are frequently associated with a particular microbial adaptation, such as antibiotic resistance, pathogen virulence, or metal resistance, this suggests that microbes may have access to a larger "arsenal" of novel genes for adaptation than previously thought.
随着环境采样表明在尚未培养的微生物中存在更多此类新基因,“新的”(在其他物种中未检测到同源物)微生物基因越来越受到关注。通过分析已知的微生物基因组岛和原噬菌体,我们制定了系统鉴定63个原核生物基因组中假定基因组岛(原核生物基因组中可能具有水平起源的基因簇)的标准,然后对新基因的分布和其他特征进行了表征。与基因组的其余部分相比,除少数几个被检查的基因组外,其他所有基因组在其预测的基因组岛中都含有比例显著更高的新基因(配对t检验=4.43E-14至1.27E-18,取决于方法)。此外,在任何被检查的生物体中,相反的观察结果(即岛外新基因比例更高)从未达到统计学显著性。我们表明,预测的基因组岛中新基因比例较高并非由于基因组岛区域的基因预测不准确,而是可能反映了细菌和古细菌在这些区域新基因的真正增加。这代表了对原核生物基因组岛中新基因的首次全面分析,并为新基因的起源提供了线索。我们的总体结果表明,与主要垂直遗传的区域相比,与最近水平转移的基因组区域相关的基因库不同。此外,与基因组岛相关的基因库中存在更多新基因。由于基因组岛经常与特定的微生物适应性相关,如抗生素抗性、病原体毒力或金属抗性,这表明微生物可能比以前认为的有更多的新基因“武器库”用于适应。