Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者严重肢体缺血的评估:磁共振血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较

Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

作者信息

Lapeyre Matthieu, Kobeiter Hicham, Desgranges Pascal, Rahmouni Alain, Becquemin Jean-Pierre, Luciani Alain

机构信息

Service de Radiologie et d'Imagerie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, 51 Avenue du Mal. De Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Creteil Cedex, France.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Dec;185(6):1641-50. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1111.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid MR angiography by comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients prospectively underwent both hybrid MR angiography and DSA. The hybrid MR angiography study consisted of high-resolution MR angiography of a single calf and foot using a contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination with surface coils, followed by three-station bolus chase MR angiography with a dedicated peripheral vascular coil. Two blinded reviewers separately analyzed maximum-intensity-projection hybrid MR angiograms and DSA images. The peripheral vessels were divided into 10 anatomic segments for review. The status of each segment was graded as normal, stenosis less than 50% in diameter, stenosis greater than 50%, or occluded. The sensitivity and specificity of hybrid MR angiography were determined using DSA as the gold standard. Treatment options were considered separately from the results of each examination.

RESULTS

Among 310 analyzed segments, the sensitivities of hybrid MR angiography for stenosis and occlusion were, respectively, 95% and 95% for reviewer 1 and 96% and 90% for reviewer 2. The specificities of hybrid MR angiography for stenosis and occlusion were, respectively, 98% and 98% for reviewer 1 and 98% and 99% for reviewer 2. In 25 patients (81%), the quality of bolus chase MR angiography images was insufficient to assess runoff arteries. All treatments proposed on the basis of DSA findings were endorsed by hybrid MR angiography findings. Eleven more treatments were formulated on the basis of hybrid MR angiography findings. Of these, four were due to overestimation of stenosis on MR angiography and seven were due to the detection of patent infrageniculate arteries on hybrid MR angiography that were not detected on DSA.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid MR angiography depicts runoff arteries not seen on DSA. Hybrid MR angiography may be useful for treatment planning in selected diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过与数字减影血管造影(DSA)对比,评估混合磁共振血管造影对糖尿病严重肢体缺血患者的诊断准确性。

对象与方法

31例患者前瞻性地接受了混合磁共振血管造影和DSA检查。混合磁共振血管造影研究包括使用表面线圈的对比增强三维梯度回波容积内插屏气检查对单小腿和足部进行高分辨率磁共振血管造影,随后使用专用外周血管线圈进行三站团注追踪磁共振血管造影。两名盲法阅片者分别分析最大强度投影混合磁共振血管造影图像和DSA图像。外周血管分为10个解剖节段进行评估。每个节段的状态分为正常、直径狭窄小于50%、狭窄大于50%或闭塞。以DSA作为金标准确定混合磁共振血管造影的敏感性和特异性。治疗方案根据每次检查结果分别考虑。

结果

在310个分析节段中,阅片者1对狭窄和闭塞的混合磁共振血管造影敏感性分别为95%和95%,阅片者2分别为96%和90%。阅片者1对狭窄和闭塞的混合磁共振血管造影特异性分别为98%和98%,阅片者2分别为98%和99%。25例患者(81%)的团注追踪磁共振血管造影图像质量不足以评估流出动脉。基于DSA结果提出的所有治疗方案均得到混合磁共振血管造影结果的认可。基于混合磁共振血管造影结果制定了另外11种治疗方案。其中,4种是由于磁共振血管造影对狭窄的高估,7种是由于混合磁共振血管造影检测到DSA未检测到的膝下动脉通畅。

结论

混合磁共振血管造影可显示DSA上未见的流出动脉。混合磁共振血管造影可能有助于选定的糖尿病严重肢体缺血患者的治疗规划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验