Shahidi Hooman, Barker Matthew L, Sagel Paul A, Gerlach Robert W
The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, OH, USA.
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):91-5.
This research compared the clinical response of two different peroxide-containing gel formulations delivered using self-applied whitening strips.
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted to compare a one-week 10% hydrogen peroxide thin (0.13 mm) bleaching gel (Crest Whitestrips Premium) to a marketed two-week 6% hydrogen peroxide strip (0.20 mm) control (Crest Whitestrips). The maxillary arch was treated twice daily for 30 minutes. Efficacy (Lab* color change) was measured objectively by digital image analysis after one and two weeks.
A total of 40 adults ranging from 19-48 years of age participated in the study. Both treatments were effective in whitening teeth, as evidenced by a statistically significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.001) beginning at one week. At that time, the adjusted mean deltab* (SE) (yellowness reduction) for the 10% strip was -2.42 (0.147) compared to -1.91 (0.143) for the 6% strip, with the treatments differing significantly (p = 0.02). At two weeks, the adjusted mean deltab* (SE) for the 10% strip was -3.31 (0.182) compared to -2.49 (0.167) for the control. After two weeks, treatments differed significantly (p < 0.02) for deltab* and deltaL* (lightness improvement). Comparing results from two weeks of the 6% control strip to one week of the 10% strip, the mean deltab* treatment difference was -0.07 (90% confidence interval from -0.44 to +0.31). Both treatments were generally well tolerated, with mild and transient tooth sensitivity or oral irritation representing the most common adverse events.
Vital bleaching with 10% hydrogen peroxide strips at one week was as effective as 6% hydrogen peroxide strips used for two weeks.
本研究比较了使用自行粘贴美白牙贴递送的两种不同含过氧化物凝胶配方的临床反应。
进行了一项随机双盲临床试验,将一周使用的10% 过氧化氢薄型(0.13毫米)漂白凝胶(佳洁士美白牙贴高级版)与市售的两周使用的6% 过氧化氢牙贴(0.20毫米)对照品(佳洁士美白牙贴)进行比较。上颌牙弓每天治疗两次,每次30分钟。在1周和2周后通过数字图像分析客观测量疗效(Lab*颜色变化)。
共有40名年龄在19至48岁之间的成年人参与了该研究。两种治疗方法在牙齿美白方面均有效,从第1周开始与基线相比有统计学显著改善(p < 0.001)。此时,10%牙贴的调整后平均Δb*(标准误)(黄度降低)为-2.42(0.147),而6%牙贴为-1.91(0.143),两种治疗方法差异显著(p = 0.02)。在2周时,10%牙贴的调整后平均Δb*(标准误)为-3.31(0.182),而对照品为-2.49(0.167)。2周后,两种治疗方法在Δb和ΔL(明度改善)方面差异显著(p < 0.02)。将6%对照牙贴2周的结果与10%牙贴1周的结果进行比较,平均Δb*治疗差异为-0.07(90%置信区间为-0.44至+0.31)。两种治疗方法总体耐受性良好,轻度和短暂的牙齿敏感或口腔刺激是最常见的不良事件。
1周使用10%过氧化氢牙贴进行活髓漂白与2周使用6%过氧化氢牙贴效果相同。